At the Lectern
AUGUST 20, 2021
They reiterate the argument today and say, “the easiest solution is for the California Supreme Court to allow the recall election to go forward, but hold that if Newsom is recalled, the lieutenant governor will then become governor until the expiration of Newsom’s term in January 2023.”
LawSites
MARCH 18, 2024
the morning of a critical meeting at Harvard Law School, where I worked. Harvard professor Jonathan Zittrain and l were sitting down with Daniel Lewis and Nik Reed , the founders of a legal research startup named Ravel Law, along with lawyers from Harvard’s Office of General Counsel, Debevoise & Plimpton and Gundersen Dettmer.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
JonathanTurley
AUGUST 4, 2021
However, he then said it was worth extending the moratorium because it would take time for a court to intervene and, in the interim, they could rush out money to renters despite the lack of constitutional authority to do so. Like many, I was mystified by the Supreme Court decision not to strike down the moratorium.
Patently O
MARCH 24, 2022
Editors note – I invited Professor Nina Mendelson (University of Michigan Law School) to author a guest post after reading her 2020 Admin. Law Review article titled “ The Permissibility of Acting Officials: May the President Work Around Senate Confirmation? 1) The litigation background. — Dennis Crouch.
JonathanTurley
APRIL 19, 2021
Waters’ most recent words could well be cited in the ongoing litigation over the January 6 th riot on Capitol Hill. Richard Ashby Wilson, associate law school dean at the University of Connecticut, said “Trump crossed the Rubicon and incited a mob to attack the U.S. If we don’t, we cannot go away.”.
SCOTUSBlog
DECEMBER 31, 2020
After growing up in the segregated South, Drew Days attended Yale Law School, worked as a civil rights lawyer alongside Martin Luther King, Jr., In that role, he argued 17 cases before the Supreme Court, including U.S. And I had their ear, explaining Supreme Court decisions on a regular basis over many years.
JonathanTurley
DECEMBER 27, 2020
The threat to the free press is obvious and was the basis for foundational court decisions. The standard for defamation for public figures and officials in the United States is the product of a decision over 50 years ago in New York Times v. Like “disinformation,” it is heavily laden with subjectivity.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
49 
Let's personalize your content