article thumbnail

Pair of immigration cases come to the court on key issue in some deportation proceedings

SCOTUSBlog

Congress extended the Immigration and Nationality Act, which regulates immigration into the United States, in 1988 to give immigration enforcement authorities, now the Department of Homeland Security, the power to automatically deport noncitizens convicted of an “aggravated felony” at the state or federal level.

article thumbnail

Justices grapple with question of federal court review in immigration cases

SCOTUSBlog

Garland , an immigration case that raises a question about federal court review for noncitizens who were denied certain types of discretionary relief. First, the applicant must meet precise eligibility requirements under the statute. Second, immigration officials must exercise their discretion to grant the relief.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Justices will decide scope of judicial review over certain immigration decisions

SCOTUSBlog

Congress created a process known as “adjustment of status” so that immigrants physically present in the United States could change their status to that of a lawful permanent resident (i.e., In 2012, Patel was placed in deportation proceedings before an immigration judge. The Supreme Court will hear oral argument in the case on Monday.

article thumbnail

Supreme Court Upholds Ban on Encouraging Illegal Immigration

Constitutional Law Reporter

Supreme Court upheld a federal law that criminalizes “encouraging or inducing” an immigrant to come or remain in the United States unlawfully. In reaching its decision, the Court acknowledged that an expansive reading of the statute would render it unconstitutional. In United States v. Hansen , 599 U.S. _ (2023), the U.S.

article thumbnail

Does the federal law that prohibits encouraging or inducing unlawful immigration violate the First Amendment?

SCOTUSBlog

Share For four years, Helaman Hansen falsely promised undocumented immigrants that they could, for a substantial fee, become U.S. 1324(a)(1)(iv) , the federal law that criminalizes “encouraging or inducing unlawful immigration,” violates the First Amendment’s guarantee of free of speech. citizens through “adult adoption.”

article thumbnail

Ninth Circuit rules possession of forged SSN is grounds for deportation

JURIST

” The Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) found “that this conviction was a crime involving moral turpitude that made him ineligible for cancellation of removal” from the United States. ” The post Ninth Circuit rules possession of forged SSN is grounds for deportation appeared first on JURIST - News.

article thumbnail

Justices divided on the constitutionality of the federal law that bans “encouraging” immigrants to remain unlawfully in the United States

SCOTUSBlog

1324(a)(1)(iv) , the federal law that criminalizes “encouraging or inducing” an immigrant to come or remain in the United States unlawfully, violates the First Amendment’s guarantee of freedom of speech. Justice Sonia Sotomayor appeared the most skeptical of the government’s construction. and intending them to violate the law.