Constitutional Law Laws Litigating Oregon 
JonathanTurley
DECEMBER 29, 2022
The complaint states that Scofield was in Oregon with her husband visiting friends when the murders occurred. That was the case with the litigation over the false claims made against former Rep. contempt,’ and language used ‘in a loose, figurative sense’ have all been accorded constitutional protection.” to murder the students.
Constitutional Law Reporter
JANUARY 25, 2024
Individuals are sometimes removed from the No Fly List during ongoing litigation about their placement on that list. 1770 (2022), the Supreme Court held that that the provision contravened Congress’s constitutional authority to “establish…uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies,” U.S. In Siegel v.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
JonathanTurley
APRIL 15, 2022
Below is my column in the Hill on the litigation over the new admissions policy at the elite Thomas Jefferson High School in Fairfax, Virginia. Indeed, Oregon recently achieved equity in graduation rates by simply suspending the need to be proficient in reading, math, and writing. Done: Instant equity.
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
AUGUST 4, 2021
Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. climate litigation charts. By Margaret Barry and Korey Silverman-Roati. and non-U.S. HERE ARE THE ADDITIONS TO THE CLIMATE CASE CHART SINCE UPDATE # 148.
JonathanTurley
JUNE 27, 2022
That world is already taking shape with states crafting their laws reflecting the values of their citizens from Colorado passing a law protecting the right to abortion up to the moment of birth to Louisiana banning all abortions except in limited circumstances. Below is my Hill column on what to expect in a post-Roe world.
JonathanTurley
JANUARY 3, 2024
It would then depend on the Maine litigation to bring the matter back to the Court. Here is the column: It is “a sad day for America and the Constitution when a court decides the outcome of an election.” justices as being, in the words of law professor Cass Sunstein, “ illegitimate, undemocratic, and unprincipled.”
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
35 
Let's personalize your content