Remove Constitutional Law Remove Entertainment Remove Litigation Remove Statute
article thumbnail

SCOTUS Rules Quiet Title Act’s Time Bar Is Claim-Processing Rule

Constitutional Law Reporter

Supreme Court held that the Quiet Title Act’s statute of limitations is a claim-processing rule rather than a bright-line rule that constrains a court’s jurisdiction. The post SCOTUS Rules Quiet Title Act’s Time Bar Is Claim-Processing Rule appeared first on Constitutional Law Reporter. In Wilkins v. Fort Bend County v.

article thumbnail

Federal Judge Enjoins Tennessee Law Limiting Drag Shows

JonathanTurley

The vagueness problems could be reduced by limiting the scope to adult entertainment settings. Section 2 of the Statute makes it “an offense for a person to perform adult cabaret entertainment,” either “(A) On public property; or (B) in a location where the adult cabaret entertainment could be viewed by a person who is not an adult.”

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Justices Refuse to Require Issue Exhaustion of Social Security Claimant

Constitutional Law Reporter

In her opinion, Justice Sotomayor explained that administrative review schemes commonly require parties to give the agency an opportunity to address an issue before seeking judicial review of that question, noting that such administrative issue-exhaustion requirements are typically creatures of statute or regulation. Citing Sims v.

Statute 52
article thumbnail

Supreme Court Rules States Can’t Challenge Federal Immigration Policy

Constitutional Law Reporter

The States of Texas and Louisiana claim that the Guidelines contravene two federal statutes that they contend require the arrest of certain noncitizens upon their release from prison ( 8 U.S.C. Federal courts have not traditionally entertained that kind of lawsuit; indeed, the States cite no precedent for a lawsuit like this.

article thumbnail

Supreme Court Allows Pre-enforcement Challenge Against Texas Abortion Law to Proceed

Constitutional Law Reporter

8 violates the Constitution. The Fifth Circuit decided to entertain a second interlocutory appeal filed by Mr. Dickson given the overlap in issues between his appeal and the appeal filed by the public-official defendants. 8 suits in state court may be litigants adverse to the petitioners. Private parties who seek to bring S.

Court 69