Constitutional Law Court Decisions Law School Legal 
Constitutional Law Reporter
JUNE 3, 2022
Jackson, 51, also adds to the relative “youth” of the current Court, with Justice Amy Coney Barrett, Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh also in their 50s. Jackson Brings Diversity to the Supreme Court. Like many of her peers on the Supreme Court, Jackson attended a prestigious law school, graduating from Harvard Law School in 1996.
JonathanTurley
JULY 12, 2022
She has called for “genuine” law professors not to fall “into complicity with lawlessness” in teaching such subjects. It is the latest voice of intolerance and orthodoxy at a leading law school. In the age of rage, calls for radical action from both professors and students have been particularly amplified at Georgetown University.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
SCOTUSBlog
APRIL 13, 2022
He is also a graduate of Columbia Law School. In Harlan’s case, the story arc that first attracted me was the notion of posthumous vindication – how a man who went so far out on a limb in his time could land so comfortably in the mainstream of legal thought. I corresponded with Canellos about his book. The back story.
JonathanTurley
AUGUST 4, 2021
It was later preserved by a divided Supreme Court despite the view of a majority that it was unconstitutional. President Biden acknowledged that his legal experts overwhelmingly told him that any extension would violate the Constitution. Like many, I was mystified by the Supreme Court decision not to strike down the moratorium.
JonathanTurley
APRIL 19, 2021
After the riot, various legal experts appeared on news channels to proclaim that this was a strong if not conclusive case for criminal incitement. CNN legal analyst Elie Honig declared “As a prosecutor I’d gladly show a jury Trump’s own inflammatory statements and argue they cross the line to criminality.”
JonathanTurley
JANUARY 9, 2024
Now the chatter has again started in the same quarters that a Democrat retaking the White House would allow the packing of the Court with an immediate liberal majority to force through sweeping court mandates. In the name of fighting ideological bias, they demand packing the Court with reliable ideological allies from the left.
JonathanTurley
DECEMBER 27, 2020
The threat to the free press is obvious and was the basis for foundational court decisions. The standard for defamation for public figures and officials in the United States is the product of a decision over 50 years ago in New York Times v. Like “disinformation,” it is heavily laden with subjectivity.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
52 
Let's personalize your content