JURIST

JANUARY 13, 2024

The US Supreme Court announced Friday that it will hear the case Starbucks Corp. McKinney , originally filed due to Starbucks’ firing of employees attempting to unionize , to determine the appropriate legal standard by which courts should review National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) preliminary injunction decisions.

Court 209

Court Court Rules Legal Legal 209

At the Lectern

FEBRUARY 2, 2023

Starbucks Corp. Vigilant Insurance Company. The Sixth District Court of Appeal published opinion held an employee might have a claim for unpaid wages where his employer rounded the amount of time he worked for payment purposes even though it recorded his time to the minute. 2018) 5 Cal.5th 5th 829 (see here ) and Donohue v.

Demurrer 45

Demurrer Contract Tort Entertainment 45

SCOTUSBlog

JANUARY 10, 2024

Consider Starbucks Corp. The NLRB accused Starbucks of interfering with lawful efforts by barristas in Memphis to unionize, and the NLRB successfully obtained a preliminary injunction that (among other things) required the coffee chain to temporarily reinstate workers that it had fired. 5 conference) Starbucks Corp.

Court 100

Court Laws Government Immigration 100