Remove companies singapore-international-arbitration-centre
article thumbnail

India high court dismisses Future Group plea to quash Amazon’s SIAC arbitration

JURIST

The Delhi High Court Tuesday dismissed two petitions filed by Future Group companies seeking to quash Amazon’s arbitration proceedings before the Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC).

Court 193
article thumbnail

India Supreme Court upholds arbitration order blocking $3.4B Reliance-Future acquisition deal

JURIST

The Supreme Court of India on Friday upheld an order of the Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC) as legally enforceable in India, effectively blocking the sale of Future Group (“Future”) to Reliance Industries Limited (“Reliance”). The sale was part of a ?247.3 billion (US$3.4

Court 197
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Traveling Judges and International Commercial Courts

Conflict of Laws

International commercial courts —domestic courts, chambers, and divisions dedicated to commercial or international commercial disputes such as the Netherlands Commercial Court and the never-implemented Brussels International Business Court —are the topic of much discussion these days. Written by Alyssa S. King and Pamela K.

Court 97
article thumbnail

Amazon takes legal challenge against partner Future Group to India Supreme Court

JURIST

It further contends that the company would face “irreparable harm” if the Division Bench order is not stayed by the top court. ” Amazon contends that the Division Bench order is “illegal,” “arbitrary” and without jurisdiction.

Legal 186
article thumbnail

Turnkey Contracts and Substituted Performance

LexForti

For this purpose, this article shall rely on model turnkey contracts drafted by Indian and international institutions, [3] apart from relevant case law and statutory provisions. 7] Michael Schneider, Turnkey Contracts: Concept, Liability and Claims (MCE International Company Lawyers’ Conference, Paris, 1986) 340. [8] 16] Ibid 5.