Remove companies oracle-corp
article thumbnail

Oracle Opposes Investors' $5M Fee Bid In Chancery Case

Law 360

Oracle Corp. billion company deal for NetSuite Inc., arguing they should not be rewarded after "dragging" the company and directors and officers "through years of meritless litigation."

article thumbnail

Oracle Class Attys Seek $5M Chancery Fee Despite Case Toss

Law 360

Oracle Corp. billion company deal for Netsuite Inc. are seeking a $5 million "mootness fee," citing the company's mid-case decision to add two independent directors to its board. stockholder class attorneys who lost a Delaware Chancery Court challenge to an allegedly overpriced, $9.3

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Chancery Rules Ellison Didn't Coerce Oracle To Buy NetSuite

Law 360

Oracle Corp. Ellison did not coerce the company into paying $3 billion too much for NetSuite Inc. founder Lawrence J. in 2016 and did not mislead a special board committee that was negotiating the $9.3 billion deal, the Delaware Chancery Court ruled Friday.

article thumbnail

Ellison Pressed On His Account Of Oracle-NetSuite Deal

Law 360

An Oracle Corp. stockholder attorney challenged company founder Lawrence J. in 2016, midway through a Delaware Chancery Court trial on claims that Oracle overpaid by $3 billion. Ellison Wednesday on ambiguities in accounts of his role in a $9.3 billion acquisition of NetSuite Inc.

article thumbnail

Oracle, Class Attys Spar Over Oracle Suit Post-Toss Fees

Law 360

Sparks are flying between Oracle Corp. stockholder attorneys and company founder Larry Ellison in Delaware Chancery Court over proposed cost-shifting and corporate benefit claims after a vice chancellor's decision May 12 to dismiss a six-year-old suit accusing Ellison of orchestrating an overpriced $9.3

article thumbnail

Supreme Court on Patent Law for April 2021

Patently O

Oracle America, Inc., holding that Google’s use of Oracle’s Java API was a fair use and therefore not copyright infringement. In this case, the employee started his own competing company and was sued for patent infringement. Kingston Technology Company, Inc., Furniture Company, Inc. by Dennis Crouch.

Laws 82