JURIST
APRIL 16, 2021
Landlords and property investment firms, however, have criticized the law for interfering with the housing market and policy. The post Germany top court rules Berlin rent cap is unconstitutional appeared first on JURIST - News - Legal News & Commentary.
Conflict of Laws
DECEMBER 4, 2023
The enactment was accompanied by amendments to the Rules of Court 2021, Singapore International Commercial Court Rules 2021 and Family Justice Rules 2014.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
JURIST
AUGUST 29, 2022
The Convention creates conditions for recognizing and enforcing judgements in both civil and commercial matters. It was created in 2019 to ensure that there was a legal avenue for assessing international court rulings on matters of trade. The hope of the Convention is to ensure that this process becomes more transparent.
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
JUNE 1, 2022
Civil law cases. Civil lawsuits were filed in Sendai in 2017 and Kobe in 2018 by citizens against corporations that planned to build new coal-fired power plants. a group of citizens submitted a civil law complaint requesting an injunction to stop the construction and subsequent operation of two coal-fired power plants.
JURIST
OCTOBER 25, 2023
Along these lines, the last paragraph of article 21º of the Peruvian civil code was declared unconstitutional because there were no reasons to protect the differential legal treatment between fathers and mothers who want to register their children without revealing the identity of the other parent.
Conflict of Laws
JUNE 30, 2022
According to the 2021 Conference Summary, the judgments of most of China’s major trading partners, including almost all common law countries as well as most civil law countries, can be enforceable in China. 1, marking the first time that an English monetary judgment has been enforced in China based on reciprocity.
Conflict of Laws
DECEMBER 12, 2020
In the case at hand, one can hardly argue that the Court has the jurisdiction under Article 265 of the CPL, as the statue is not located in China when the action was filed, nor did the defendants steal it or purchase it in China, nor do they have distrainable property or representative office in China. Concluding Remarks. De dr. int.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
223 
Let's personalize your content