JURIST

APRIL 9, 2021

A judge for Shawnee County District Court in Kansas blocked the state’s ban on Dilation and Evacuation (D&E) abortions Wednesday. The Kansas legislature passed Senate Bill 95 , commonly known as the Kansas Unborn Child Protection from Dismemberment Abortion Act, in 2015. The state appealed.

Court 197

Court Cause of Action Government Legal 197

SCOTUSBlog

OCTOBER 1, 2021

The court’s decision could fundamentally restructure interstate groundwater law in the United States for decades — or the case could be dismissed immediately on the grounds that Mississippi has failed to allege the proper cause of action. Equitable apportionment cases started with Kansas v.

Cause of Action 134

Cause of Action Court Legal Legal 134

JonathanTurley

OCTOBER 30, 2022

Kansas City Light & Power Company v. Kansas City Light & Power Company v. The retailer filed a motion for partial summary judgment as to plaintiffs’ cause of action for failure to warn. The trial court granted the motion and dismissed the actions against the manufacturers. 32; 285 S.W. 455 (1926).

Tort 36

Tort Litigation Litigating Manufacturing 36

JonathanTurley

OCTOBER 31, 2021

Kansas City Light & Power Company v. Kansas City Light & Power Company v. The retailer filed a motion for partial summary judgment as to plaintiffs’ cause of action for failure to warn. The trial court granted the motion and dismissed the actions against the manufacturers. 32; 285 S.W. 455 (1926). “A

Tort 36

Tort Litigation Litigating Manufacturing 36

JonathanTurley

OCTOBER 30, 2023

Kansas City Light & Power Company v. Kansas City Light & Power Company v. The retailer filed a motion for partial summary judgment as to plaintiffs’ cause of action for failure to warn. The trial court granted the motion and dismissed the actions against the manufacturers. Trimble ␣ 315 Mo. 32; 285 S.W.

Tort 45

Tort Litigation Litigating Manufacturing 45

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

JULY 2, 2021

The District of Utah held that the lease suspensions merely maintained the status quo and therefore were not major federal actions subject to NEPA; the conservation groups therefore lacked standing. An eighteenth state, Kansas, filed a similar motion for limited intervention two weeks later. Living Rivers v. Hoffman , No.

Court 44

Court Statute Litigation Litigating 44