Remove Cause of Action Remove Drafting Remove Government Remove Statute
article thumbnail

Federal agencies claim immunity from suit under the Fair Credit Reporting Act

SCOTUSBlog

Kirtz presents a routine statutory drafting problem arising out of a run-of-the-mill consumer lending dispute. The government contends, though, that it has sovereign immunity and thus cannot be forced, as a private lender could be forced, to comply. The government would limit that situation to two narrow statutory scenarios.

Statute 104
article thumbnail

December 2020 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

Nissan announced that day that it would work with California and the federal government to establish “common-sense” national standards. The companies filed their brief on November 16, arguing that the Fourth Circuit erred by concluding that it was limited to reviewing removal based on the federal-officer removal statute.

Court 55
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

January 2021 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

The records included spreadsheets tracking and analyzing comments, draft ANPRM fact sheets, meeting agendas, and emails and meeting invitations regarding CEQ’s process for managing comments. 1442, or the civil-rights removal statute, 28 U.S.C. Southern Environmental Law Center v. Center for Environmental Quality , No. 20-783 (U.S.

Court 52
article thumbnail

Supreme Court to hear major case on power of federal agencies

SCOTUSBlog

Justice John Paul Stevens set out a two-part test for courts to review an agency’s interpretation of a statute it administers. If it has not, the court must uphold the agency’s interpretation of the statute as long as it is reasonable. In the Supreme Court, the fisheries are represented by former U.S.

article thumbnail

July 2021 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

The third-party complaint asserted that while the plaintiffs’ claims were meritless, Statoil, “as well as potentially the many other sovereign governments that use and promote fossil fuels,” must be joined as third-party defendants. Chevron filed similar notices of withdrawal in other cases brought by California localities. Living Rivers v.

Court 45