SCOTUSBlog

JANUARY 16, 2022

Four of them – the 2nd, 5th, 6th, and District of Columbia Circuits – have answered in the affirmative. In support of this argument, the museum points to both the text of the statute and the circumstances of its enactment: Congress removed foreign states from ordinary diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Does Klaxon apply?

Tort 127

Tort Court Laws Litigation 127

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

DECEMBER 11, 2020

The federal district court for the District of Columbia ruled that the U.S. The companies filed their brief on November 16, arguing that the Fourth Circuit erred by concluding that it was limited to reviewing removal based on the federal-officer removal statute. FEATURED CASE. Bernhardt , No. 4:16-cv-00615 (N.D.

Court 55

Court Government Litigation Litigating 55

SCOTUSBlog

MARCH 30, 2022

Kavanaugh said it would be “bizarre” to allow suits against states under the Family and Medical Leave Act and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, among others, but not under statutes enacted pursuant to Congress’ war powers, “where the national interest is at its apex as compared to those other areas.” It is likely that, as in Alden v.

Statute 100

Statute Cause of Action Court Government 100

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

NOVEMBER 16, 2020

The First Circuit—like the Fourth, Ninth, and Tenth Circuits in other climate change cases—concluded that the scope of its appellate review was limited to whether the defendants properly removed the case under the federal-officer removal statute. District of Columbia v. Exxon Mobil Corp. , 1:20-cv-01932 (D.D.C.): Delaware v.

Cause of Action 96

Cause of Action Court Government Litigation 96

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

JANUARY 13, 2021

On December 22, 2020, the federal district court for the District of Columbia issued an order pursuant to the All Writs Act temporarily enjoining any ground-disturbing work undertaken pursuant to the anticipated approval by the U.S. 1442, or the civil-rights removal statute, 28 U.S.C.

Court 52

Court Government Technology Assisted Review Litigation 52

SCOTUSBlog

JANUARY 16, 2024

Justice John Paul Stevens set out a two-part test for courts to review an agency’s interpretation of a statute it administers. If it has not, the court must uphold the agency’s interpretation of the statute as long as it is reasonable. In the Supreme Court, the fisheries are represented by former U.S.

Stare Decisis 145

Stare Decisis Court Statute Government 145

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

SEPTEMBER 10, 2021

The New Jersey court also found no basis for Grable jurisdiction, rejecting the companies’ arguments that the City’s claims necessarily raised substantial and actually disputed issues of federal law such as First Amendment issues or issues addressed by federal environmental statutes. Exxon Mobil Corp. , 1:21-cv-04807 (S.D.N.Y.).

Litigation 40

Litigation Litigating Court Laws 40