article thumbnail

A seven-case late-May calendar

At the Lectern

The Supreme Court today announced it would hear arguments in seven cases at its next calendar, the second of two calendars in May. This will be a heavier calendar than the court has had in a while. Like all calendars since April 2020 , the late-May 2022 calendar will be remote and based in San Francisco.

article thumbnail

Eight-case June calendar is last one before September

At the Lectern

The Supreme Court today announced it will hear eight cases on it June calendar. Some Courts of Appeal are returning to in-person arguments, but the Supreme Court’s June calendar, like all of its calendars since April 2020 , will be remote and based in San Francisco. Proc., § 425.16, subd. (e)(4)) DoubleVerify Inc.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Seven cases on the late-May calendar

At the Lectern

The Supreme Court has announced a seven-case late-May calendar. Like all calendars since April 2020 , and for the foreseeable future, May’s arguments will be remote and based in San Francisco. (See May is the only month with two oral argument sessions. See here , here , here , and here.) The court granted review in March 2020.

article thumbnail

Murder resentencing, employment discrimination opinions filing Monday

At the Lectern

The case involves Senate Bill 1437 , which narrowed murder liability under the felony murder theory and the natural and probable consequences doctrine. Lewis was argued on the late-May calendar and Pollock was argued in early May. The court granted review in March 2020. Tri-Modal Distribution Services.

article thumbnail

October 2019 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

On September 30, the Fourth Circuit tentatively calendared oral argument on the companies’ appeal for the December 10–12 argument session. The court also temporarily enjoined two felony riot statutes because they went “far beyond” the State’s “appropriate interest” in criminalizing participation in a riot with acts of force or violence.

Court 40
article thumbnail

March 2018 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

He had been convicted of misdemeanor trespass and felony criminal mischief and conspiracy to commit criminal mischief in October 2017. A second activist who filmed the action was convicted of felony conspiracy to commit criminal mischief and conspiracy trespass, a misdemeanor.

Court 40