Remove Arizona Remove Attorney Remove Court Rules Remove Immigration
article thumbnail

Divided court declines to reinstate Biden’s immigration guidelines, sets case for argument this fall

SCOTUSBlog

Share The Supreme Court will again weigh the executive branch’s authority to set immigration policy as some red states claim that the Biden administration’s enforcement decisions are too lax. The justices will hear the case in late November without waiting for a federal appeals court to weigh in.

article thumbnail

Justices will hear gripe from GOP-led states over Biden’s refusal to defend legality of Trump-era immigration rule

SCOTUSBlog

Share On Wednesday, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in a dispute over whether a group of states, led by Arizona, can defend a contentious Trump-era immigration policy known as the “public charge” rule after the Biden administration declined to do so. The oral argument in Arizona v. immigration court.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Justices probe states’ effort to defend Trump immigration rule after Biden stopped defending it in court

SCOTUSBlog

Share The Supreme Court heard oral argument on Wednesday in a case involving whether a group of states can defend a contentious Trump-era immigration policy known as the “public charge” rule after the Biden administration refused to do so. After nearly 90 minutes of debate in Arizona v.

article thumbnail

“Remain in Mexico” and Texas’ anti-abortion law

SCOTUSBlog

immigration court. After Texas and Missouri challenged that decision, a federal district court vacated the secretary’s termination, in part on the administrative-law ground that the decision was insufficiently explained. Issue : Whether the Supreme Court’s decision in Lynch v. In her cert petition, the U.S. Hasbro, Inc.

Laws 125
article thumbnail

North Carolina Republican lawmakers win right to intervene in court and defend state’s voter-ID law

SCOTUSBlog

Two lower courts had rejected the legislators’ request, reasoning that the state’s Democratic attorney general and the board of elections were already defending the law, but the justices reversed those rulings. She described Thursday’s ruling as “wrong for two reasons.” And in Arizona v.

Laws 139
article thumbnail

They Called 911 for Help. Police and Prosecutors Used a New Junk Science to Decide They Were Liars.

The Crime Report

Searches for 911 call analysis in national court dockets come up virtually empty too. Dozens of other defense attorneys had similar reactions. A team of researchers from Arizona State University and John Jay College of Criminal Justice recently received a federal grant to study 1,000 911 calls. But Gibbons told someone.

article thumbnail

March 2018 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

The federal district court for the Southern District of California rejected challenges to waivers of environmental laws granted by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) for certain types of border wall construction projects in San Diego County. 22, 2018; consolidated ruling Jan. Arizona Board of Regents , No. judgment Feb.

Court 40