JURIST

OCTOBER 18, 2021

The government is arguing that the Court of Indian Offenses is a tribunal exercising the sovereign powers of the Navajo tribe, while Denezpi is arguing that the Court of Indian Offenses is a federal agency, precluding the dual-sovereignty doctrine. The second case is Ysleta del Sur Pueblo v.

Court 291

Court Entertainment Government Laws 291

SCOTUSBlog

MARCH 8, 2022

The court heard argument in: Ysleta del Sur Pueblo v. Environmental Protection Agency. Share Oyez has posted the aligned audio and transcripts from the February 2022 oral arguments at the Supreme Court. United States. City and County of San Francisco. West Virginia v. United States. DaVita, Inc. Egbert v.

Court 80

Court 80

Constitutional Law Reporter

MARCH 10, 2022

The specific question before the Court is whether the Court of Indian Offenses of Ute Mountain Ute Agency is a federal agency such that Merle Denezpi’s conviction in that court barred his subsequent prosecution in a United States District Court for a crime arising out of the same incident? Ysleta del Sur Pueblo v.

Immigration 52

Immigration Constitutional Law Drafting Court 52

SCOTUSBlog

OCTOBER 14, 2021

Ysleta del Sur Pueblo v. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit’s decision affirming Ysleta del Sur Pueblo v. Texas (Ysleta I) correctly subjects the Pueblo to all Texas gaming regulations. Environmental Protection Agency , 20-1530. Environmental Protection Agency , 20-1531.

Immigration 86

Immigration Punitive Damages Court Compensatory Damages 86

SCOTUSBlog

OCTOBER 27, 2021

The Supreme Court granted review in Ysleta del Sur Pueblo v. United States , 20-7622 , involving whether the Court of Indian Offenses of the Ute Mountain Ute Agency is a federal agency for purposes of a criminal conviction in that court. Environmental Protection Agency , 20-1530. 15 conferences).

Court 77

Court Government Cause of Action Manufacturing 77

SCOTUSBlog

OCTOBER 18, 2021

The question is whether the court constitutes a “federal agency” so that a conviction in that court bars a later prosecution in a federal district court for a crime arising out of the same incident. Denezpi argues that the dual-sovereignty doctrine does not apply because the Court of Indian Offenses is a federal agency.

Court 106

Court Laws Immigration Government 106

SCOTUSBlog

OCTOBER 5, 2021

Four cases brought by states and coal producers challenging the authority of the Environmental Protection Agency to regulate greenhouse gases at the national level. Ysleta del Sur Pueblo v. Ysleta del Sur Pueblo v. Environmental Protection Agency , 20-1530. 27 conference).

Punitive Damages 55

Punitive Damages Compensatory Damages Court Statute 55