SCOTUSBlog

FEBRUARY 4, 2022

Brent Newton is a visiting professor of law at Penn State-Dickinson School of Law. He previously taught seminars on Breyer’s jurisprudence at American University Washington College of Law. These pragmatists consider the real-world consequences of the court’s decisions and value stare decisis and narrow rulings.

Stare Decisis 88

Stare Decisis Administrative Law Government Court 88

SCOTUSBlog

MAY 11, 2022

Both cases arise in the context of administrative proceedings brought by independent enforcement agencies against regulated parties — Axon by the Federal Trade Commission, and Cochran by the Securities and Exchange Commission. relisted after the April 29 conference). Returning Relists. Texas , 21-6001.

Stare Decisis 79

Stare Decisis Administrative Law Statute Government 79

SCOTUSBlog

MAY 20, 2022

Cochran , the justices will decide whether federal district courts have the power to consider claims challenging the constitutionality of the commission’s administrative law proceedings. In Securities and Exchange Commission v. The case is sufficiently similar to Axon Enterprise, Inc.

Stare Decisis 121

Stare Decisis Court Lawyer Lawyers 121

SCOTUSBlog

JANUARY 16, 2024

In an article published in 2014, law professor Thomas Merrill suggested that the Chevron decision was not regarded as a particularly consequential one when it was issued. But in the decades since then, it became one of the most significant rulings on federal administrative law, cited by federal courts more than 18,000 times.

Stare Decisis 145

Stare Decisis Court Statute Government 145