SCOTUSBlog

NOVEMBER 7, 2022

Talevski , to be argued Tuesday, returns the court to the question of when federal law is subject to private enforcement. The court will consider whether to overrule a line of precedent and to hold that private individuals cannot use 42 U.S.C. The district court dismissed the action, but the U.S. of Marion County v.

Stare Decisis 90

Stare Decisis Statute Court Contract 90

SCOTUSBlog

FEBRUARY 4, 2022

Brent Newton is a visiting professor of law at Penn State-Dickinson School of Law. He previously taught seminars on Breyer’s jurisprudence at American University Washington College of Law. Two spectrums exist among Supreme Court justices, particularly those who have served since the New Deal ushered in the modern America.

Stare Decisis 90

Stare Decisis Administrative Law Government Court 90

SCOTUSBlog

MAY 11, 2022

Share The Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has “relisted” for its upcoming conference. This week they’re replaced by three new relists, all involving government petitions in one way or another. Our first relist this week is the government’s petition in Securities and Exchange Commission v.

Stare Decisis 81

Stare Decisis Administrative Law Statute Government 81

SCOTUSBlog

APRIL 18, 2022

George’s petition asserted that the board’s 1977 decision had rested on a “clear and unmistakable error” because the board had failed to correctly apply the “presumption of sound condition” required by a different provision of the statute governing veterans’ benefits.

Statute 107

Statute Stare Decisis Government Contract 107

SCOTUSBlog

JANUARY 16, 2024

Share The Supreme Court will hear oral argument on Wednesday in a case involving the deference that courts should give to federal agencies’ interpretations of the laws that they administer. Justice John Paul Stevens set out a two-part test for courts to review an agency’s interpretation of a statute it administers.

Stare Decisis 145

Stare Decisis Court Statute Government 145