JURIST
JUNE 22, 2021
The US Supreme Court ruled 5-4 on Monday in United States v. Arthrex that the America Invents Act gives powers to Administrative Patent Judges (APJs) that are inconsistent with the appointments clause of the US Constitution.
Law 360
AUGUST 29, 2023
Supreme Court case that could spell the end of administrative law courts, urging the nation's highest court to reverse a lower court ruling that the agency says could prevent it from protecting investors against potentially harmful conduct.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
SCOTUSBlog
APRIL 22, 2021
Saul considered whether Social Security claimants are required not only to go through the administrative process before seeking relief in court, but whether they must raise before the agency all of the issues they will present when they get to court. Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote the opinion for the court.
JonathanTurley
JUNE 12, 2022
That includes the Supreme Court’s unambiguous statement that “[w]hen an employee engages in speech that is part of the employee’s job duties, the employee’s words are really the words of the employer.” of State, County, and Mun. Employees, Council 31 (2018). ” Despite such decisions, the NRLB continues to push these claims.
JURIST
FEBRUARY 3, 2021
In determining whether the French state had failed in its obligations, the court ruled that the state could only be held responsible for part of the damages if it had not respected its commitments to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions.
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
JUNE 1, 2022
This case is still pending before the Kobe District Court. Administrative complaints. The Osaka District Court and the Osaka High Court ruled that the plaintiffs lacked standing to bring the claims related to GHG emissions. This case is now brought before the Supreme Court.
SCOTUSBlog
NOVEMBER 4, 2022
It sued in a federal district court, arguing that the FTC’s proceedings are unconstitutional both because the method of appointing ALJs (administrative law judges) violates the Constitution’s appointments clause and because the combination of investigatory, prosecutorial, and adjudicatory functions offends the due process clause.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
104 
Let's personalize your content