article thumbnail

Allegations of racial bias in a death penalty trial

SCOTUSBlog

Cochran , the justices will decide whether federal district courts have the power to consider claims challenging the constitutionality of the commission’s administrative law proceedings. Texas , 21-6001. Issues : (1) Whether, on remand, the Texas court rejected the Supreme Court’s conclusions in Andrus v.

article thumbnail

Affirmative action cases up first in November argument calendar

SCOTUSBlog

7): Whether federal district courts have the power to consider claims challenging the constitutionality of the commission’s administrative law proceedings. 8): Whether federal laws enacted under Congress’ spending clause power allow a plaintiff to file a federal civil rights claim for their violation. Brackeen , Texas v.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Justices grant review in two cases that test jurisdiction of district courts

SCOTUSBlog

Cochran , the justices agreed to decide whether federal district courts have the power to consider claims challenging the constitutionality of the commission’s administrative law proceedings. Cochran went instead to a federal district court in Texas, seeking to block the administrative proceedings before the new ALJ.

Court 81
article thumbnail

The SEC’s Final Climate Disclosure Rule Must Respond to Emerging Legal Risks

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

The Court noted that the “Secretary had never previously claimed powers of this magnitude [under the Act]” and that the “economic and political significance” of the action was “staggering”. And in the Fifth Circuit’s Texas v. Walsh decision mentioned above, the federal judge employed a Chevron analysis and found in the agency’s favor.

Legal 59
article thumbnail

July 2021 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

The district court found the analysis of greenhouse gas and climate change impacts to be adequate but remanded for consideration of alternatives that did not involve leasing all nominated parcels. The conservation groups’ appeal of the district court decision is still pending, with the opening brief due on July 12. Biden , No.

Court 44
article thumbnail

Supreme Court to decide whether insurrection provision keeps Trump off ballot

SCOTUSBlog

A state administrative law judge agreed that Greene’s “heated rhetoric may well have contributed to the environment that ultimately led to” the attack on the Capitol, but he concluded that she had not engaged in an insurrection. In 2022, Georgia officials rebuffed a challenge to U.S. Marjorie Taylor Greene’s eligibility. And on Dec.

Court 145