SCOTUSBlog

APRIL 2, 2022

New York maintains that the terms of the compact provide that only Congress can repeal it and that, insofar as the compact represents a federal statute, its breach violates federal law. In earlier litigation, the Waterfront Commission sued the New Jersey governor to prevent him from enforcing the law. However, the U.S.

Government 86

Government Statute Cause of Action Litigation 86

Law 360

JULY 18, 2022

Supreme Court's decision in West Virginia v.

Administrative Law 75

Administrative Law Court Court Decisions Litigation 75

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

MARCH 13, 2023

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has openly stated that the purpose of this litigation is to protect the fossil fuel industry , and the only representatives of the automotive industry in the case have entered to defend EPA’s new standards. This doctrine was recently and prominently applied by the Supreme Court in West Virginia v.

Manufacturing 55

Manufacturing Government Court Administrative Law 55

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

JULY 2, 2021

Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. climate litigation charts. Virginia Federal Court Said Challenge to NEPA Regulations Was Not Justiciable. Wild Virginia v. and non-U.S.

Court 44

Court Statute Litigation Litigating 44

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

OCTOBER 19, 2023

In the year since the Supreme Court embraced the “major questions doctrine” (MQD), industry and Republican state attorneys general have argued that federal regulations ranging from stricter vehicle emissions standards to climate change disclosures must be struck down under its banner. Env’t Prot.

Statute 78

Statute Court Government Administrative Law 78