Remove about-us academic-information admissions
article thumbnail

US dispatch: SCOTUS set to hear arguments in Harvard case that may end affirmative action in higher education

JURIST

Marisa Wright is a US national staff correspondent for JURIST, and a 2L at Harvard Law School. . Supreme Court is set to hear arguments next Monday in a case that could have major implications for racial equality and college admissions. The case, Students for Fair Admissions Inc. In Regents of University of California v.

Education 211
article thumbnail

Justice Jackson Accused of Second False Claim in Affirmative Action Dissent

JonathanTurley

We previously discussed how Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson included a false claim to support her dissent in the Court’s recent opinion barring racial discrimination in college admissions. Notably, however, the media is still citing the first error as proof that race-blind admissions will kill Black citizens. Hoffman et al.,

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

How to Get into Law School?

LegalTalkNetwork

Miriam Ingber (Dean of Admissions at Yale Law School) and Kristi Jobson (Dean of Admissions at Harvard Law School) discuss the admissions process and tips to getting into law school in its newest episode series “Life of a Lawyer, Start to Finish” on the Lawyer 2 Lawyer podcast. THE LAW SCHOOL ADMISSIONS PROCESS.

article thumbnail

Path To Well-Being In Law: Episode 17 – Jennifer Leonard

ALPS

And I just wanted to say, Chris, you’re talking about thought leaders and as regards to our guest today, Jen really is, she’s not only a thought leader in this space but she’s also a teacher of future thought leaders. So we’re really glad that we got Jen with us today. I’m really blessed with that.

article thumbnail

Censoring in the Name of Free Speech: Publishers and Editors Call for Banning Barrett Book

JonathanTurley

The public letter entitled “We Dissent” makes the usual absurd protestation that, just because we are seeking to ban books of those with opposing views, we still “care deeply about freedom of speech.” Her home has been targeted and activists have published school information on her young children.

article thumbnail

They Called 911 for Help. Police and Prosecutors Used a New Junk Science to Decide They Were Liars.

The Crime Report

I was confident that if a jury could hear this information and this research,” she added, “they would be as convinced as I was of the defendant’s guilt.”. What Askey didn’t say in her endorsement was this: She had once tried using Harpster’s methods against Russ Faria, a man wrongfully convicted of killing his wife. Hook me up.

article thumbnail

Supreme Hypocrisy: Activists and Pundits Target Justice Barrett as “Religious Extremist”

JonathanTurley

These absurd demands say less about the ethics of Barrett than the bias of her critics, who have waged an unrelenting and vicious campaign against the jurist and her family. When the case came up from the US Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, challengers raised claims under both the First Amendment’s religion and free-speech clauses.

Court 40