Remove 2030 Remove Diligence Remove Legal Remove Tort
article thumbnail

BNP Paribas sued in France for financing fossil fuel companies

Conflict of Laws

If damage caused by non-compliance with la Loi de Vigilance, any person with legitimate interest can seek reparation under tort law. In 2021, the Hague District Court ordered Shell to reduce both its own carbon emissions and end-use emissions by 45% by 2030 in relation to the 2019 figures.

Finance 40
article thumbnail

Guest Commentary: New Italian Constitutional Reform: What it Means for Environmental Protection, Future Generations & Climate Litigation

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

This post examines the reform and highlights the important changes it introduces to the Italian legal system. First, it provides solid legal ground for public bodies in Italy to steer economic activities to pursue environmental (and climate) objectives. This reform bears thus a two-fold implication.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Shell litigation in the Dutch courts – milestones for private international law and the fight against climate change

Conflict of Laws

Applicable law is defined based on the Dutch conflict of laws rules on torts, namely art. The same holds true for substantive law of evidence, including the specific rules on the burden of proof relating to a particular legal relationship. 1659 (2013), as well as Lubbe v. Procedural matters.

article thumbnail

July 2021 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

Animal Legal Defense Fund v. The Court found that despite being aware of the certain risk of dangerous climate change to the country’s population, the authorities failed to take necessary action, meaning that they failed to act with prudence and diligence under Article 1382 of the Civil Code. Mayor & City Council of Baltimore v.

Court 45
article thumbnail

April 2021 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

The court concluded that it lacked jurisdiction because administrative appeals that raised the same legal issues were still pending before the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. In their main conclusions, the plaintiffs seek a Court injunction directing the government to reduce emissions 42 to 48% in 2025 and at least 55 to 65% in 2030.

Court 115