Remove 2024 Remove Constitutional Law Remove Court Rules Remove Legal
article thumbnail

Supreme Court Clarifies When Public Officials Can Be held Liable for Social Media Activity

Constitutional Law Reporter

Freed , 601 U.S. _ (2024), the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that public officials may be held liable for their social media activity in certain circumstances. The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed. The Sixth Circuit Court ruled that Freed was not liable because he maintained his Facebook page in his personal capacity.

Court 52
article thumbnail

“Craven” and “Insurrectionists”: MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow and Other Denounce the Supreme Court for Granting Review of Presidential Immunity

JonathanTurley

Yesterday, the Supreme Court granted review of the presidential immunity question, but set an expedited schedule for the review of the question with oral argument scheduled for April. ” As I mentioned last night in the coverage, legal scholars are hardly doing a conga line in celebration. Monday, April 15, 2024.

Court 74
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

The Constitutional Abyss: Justices Signal a Desire to Avoid Both Cliffs on Presidential Immunity

JonathanTurley

It has been almost 50 years since the high court ruled presidents have absolute immunity from civil lawsuits in Nixon v. The court held ex-President Richard Nixon had such immunity for acts taken “within the ‘outer perimeter’ of his official responsibility.” Fitzgerald. Yet in 1974’s United States v.

article thumbnail

“This is a Moment”: Dobbs and the Realities of the Post-Roe World

JonathanTurley

.” Ironically, it was the only part of the president’s remarks that is consistent with what the court actually said in its decision in Dobbs v. Wade, the court ruled that millions of citizens, not nine justices, must now decide the question of abortion. It would also unleash potential legal challenges.

Court 36
article thumbnail

Is Colorado Counting on a Mootness Escape Clause to Avoid a Reversal on the Trump Disqualification?

JonathanTurley

Supreme Court declines to take the case or otherwise affirms the Colorado Supreme Court ruling.” It could avoid a review by the Supreme Court by effectively mooting the case if the Supreme Court simply lets the clock run past January 5, 2024. Supreme Court. 5, 2024, unless the U.S.

article thumbnail

Trump’s Liability Or Opportunity? Two Capitol Police Officers Sue Trump Over Capitol Riot

JonathanTurley

Eric Swalwell against former President Donald Trump as a serious miscalculation that could result in a legal vindication for Trump either on the trial or appellate levels. In my view, the lawsuit contravenes free speech as well as controlling case law from the Supreme Court. I recently wrote about the lawsuit by Rep.

article thumbnail

Is Eric Swalwell The Answer To Trump’s Prayers?

JonathanTurley

After all, an array of legal experts has insisted for months that this was clear criminal incitement, not an exercise of free speech. First, his lawsuit will force a court to determine if the defendants’ speeches were protected political speech. One might think this would be a lead-pipe cinch of a case.

Tort 58