article thumbnail

Walmart Hit With $4.4M Verdict In Shopper's Race Bias Suit

Law 360

An Oregon state jury hit Walmart with a $4.4 million verdict Friday, finding that the retail giant owes a shopper $400,000 in noneconomic damages and $4 million in punitive damages after a loss prevention employee racially profiled him and called the police as he was shopping for a refrigerator light bulb.

article thumbnail

December 2020 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

The plaintiffs asserted a violation of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act and requested that the court award them compensatory and punitive damages. Environmental Groups Challenged Authorization for New Natural Gas Plant in Oregon. Oregon Department of Energy , No. Adorers of the Blood of Christ v. 2:20-cv-05627 (E.D.

Court 55
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

From Forever 21 to FC Barcelona, a Look at adidas’ History of 3-Stripe Legal Battles

The Fashion Law

According to adidas’ lawsuit, which was filed in federal court in Portland, Oregon, the home of its North American headquarters, adidas claimed that Los Angeles-based Juicy “intentionally adopted and used counterfeit and/or confusingly similar imitations of the Three-Stripe Mark.” 2015: adidas v. Marc Jacobs.

Legal 64
article thumbnail

November 2020 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

Portland, Oregon. Source: Gary Halvorson, Oregon State Archives. Oregon Supreme Court Said Public Trust Doctrine Did Not Impose Obligation to Protect Resources from Climate Change. By Margaret Barry and Korey Silverman-Roati. and non-U.S. climate litigation charts. FEATURED CASE. County of Maui v. Sunoco LP , No.

article thumbnail

May 2021 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

The County seeks compensatory and punitive damages, equitable relief, attorney fees and costs of suit, and disgorgement of profits, as well as recovery for injury or loss sustained as a result of practices barred by the Consumer Protection Act. King County v. BP p.l.c. , 2:18-cv-00758 (W.D.

Court 40