Remove legal-news tax-assessment-foreign-resident
article thumbnail

Tax Exemption cannot be disallowed under India-Austria Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement only for want of Tax Residency: ITAT Hyderabad.

LexForti

In the recent case of ITAT, the tribunal held that the exemption cannot be disallowed under India-Austria Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) only for want of Tax residency certificate. On further verification by the Assessment Officer, it was determined that the gross salary of the petitioner was Rs. 10,04,580/-.

Legal 52
article thumbnail

October 2020 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

Federal Court Found Problems with Assessment of How Sea Level Rise Would Affect Skink Habitat. Federal Court Upheld State Department’s Invocation of FOIA Exception for Legal Memorandum Supporting Paris Agreement Request. California Air Resources Board v. 1:20-cv-1293 (D.D.C.

Court 72
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

September 2021 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

Circuit found that FERC failed to address the significance of a National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) regulation that the petitioners argued required use of the social cost of carbon or another methodology to assess the impacts of the projects’ greenhouse gas emissions. The states appealed the dismissal of the case. Missouri v.

article thumbnail

April 2021 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

Finally, the Second Circuit held that although the Clean Air Act did not displace New York’s federal common law claims addressing emissions outside the United States, foreign policy concerns foreclosed such claims. Center for Biological Diversity v. Bureau of Land Management , No. 17-cv-1208 (D.D.C. A year after finding that the U.S.

Court 115
article thumbnail

February 2020 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

The dissent contended that “a federal court need not manage all of the delicate foreign relations and regulatory minutiae implicated by climate change to offer real relief, and the mere fact that this suit cannot alone halt climate change does not mean that it presents no claim suitable for judicial resolution.” Williams , No.