article thumbnail

The 10 Legal Tech Trends that Defined 2021

LawSites

If a law firm is unable even to decide whether its staff should return to the office, or when that return should happen, or how to structure that return, then how can that firm implement lasting and innovative changes in its technology infrastructure and systems? This is not to say that 2021 was without innovation.

Legal 140
article thumbnail

The 10 Legal Tech Trends that Defined 2021

LawSites

If a law firm is unable even to decide whether its staff should return to the office, or when that return should happen, or how to structure that return, then how can that firm implement lasting and innovative changes in its technology infrastructure and systems? This is not to say that 2021 was without innovation.

Legal 52
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

June 2021 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

Supreme Court held that the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals erred when it concluded that its review of the remand order in Baltimore’s climate change case against fossil fuel companies was limited to determining whether the defendants properly removed the case under the federal officer removal statute. Louisiana v. Biden , No. May 10, 2021).

Court 42
article thumbnail

August 2021 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

The court also noted that states and localities “expressly maintain control over the local distribution of natural gas under related federal statutes” such as the Natural Gas Act. The court declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the plaintiff’s state law claims and dismissed them without prejudice.

Court 40
article thumbnail

Relist Watch

SCOTUSBlog

Disclosure: My law firm, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, is among the counsel to the respondent in the Baltimore case. Disclosure: My law firm, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, is among the counsel to the respondent. Kane County, Utah v. Kane County, Utah , 20-96. I am not involved in the case.].

Court 85