Remove Court Remove Drafting Remove Stare Decisis Remove Statute
article thumbnail

Private rights of action, overtime pay, and the constitutionality of a billboard tax

SCOTUSBlog

Share The Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has “relisted” for its upcoming conference. In Monday’s orders , the Supreme Court disposed of three relists. To begin with the unhappy news (at least for petitioners), the court denied review without comment in one-time relist Kelly v.

Statute 81
article thumbnail

SCOTUS nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson faces questions from senators on second day of confirmation hearings

JURIST

She said she also relies upon precedent and the concept of stare decisis to reach her judgment and form an opinion. Her understanding of the text stems from the text at the time of its founding and what was meant by those who drafted it.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Supreme Court to hear major case on power of federal agencies

SCOTUSBlog

Share The Supreme Court will hear oral argument on Wednesday in a case involving the deference that courts should give to federal agencies’ interpretations of the laws that they administer. Justice John Paul Stevens set out a two-part test for courts to review an agency’s interpretation of a statute it administers.

article thumbnail

Justice Breyer: A formidable defender of reproductive rights

SCOTUSBlog

Justice Stephen Breyer’s retirement from the Supreme Court at the end of this term will mark the end of an era. Both he and Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg — who untimely passed early in the 2020-21 term — shared similar ideological perspectives, approaches to judicial review, and paths to the Supreme Court. A close reading of Stenberg v.

article thumbnail

In a historic term, momentum to move the law often came from the five justices to the chief’s right

SCOTUSBlog

The new balance of power on the court was on display before the term officially began, when the justices rejected a request to block enforcement of S.B. The court’s third liberal, Justice Sonia Sotomayor, also dissented, though she did not join Roberts’ opinion.). An abortion prelude. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. The fall of Roe.

Laws 102