Court Reporter Court Rules Statute Texas 
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
FEBRUARY 10, 2021
Second, the court found that EPA “correctly and consistently” interpreted the Clean Air Act to permit both regulation of a source’s hazardous air pollutant emissions under Section 112 and emissions of other pollutants under Section 111(d). The magistrate judge concluded that the suit was barred by the statute of limitations.
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
FEBRUARY 10, 2020
The dissent contended that “a federal court need not manage all of the delicate foreign relations and regulatory minutiae implicated by climate change to offer real relief, and the mere fact that this suit cannot alone halt climate change does not mean that it presents no claim suitable for judicial resolution.” 19-50178 (5th Cir.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
55 
Let's personalize your content