Court Reporter Court Rules District of Columbia Tort 
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
FEBRUARY 10, 2021
The court was not persuaded that completion of construction of the pipeline would moot the appeals and concluded both that the Commission was not required to consider whether the appeal raised substantial issues and also that it was not clear that the appeals raised substantial questions that would override other factors to require a stay.
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
FEBRUARY 10, 2020
The dissent contended that “a federal court need not manage all of the delicate foreign relations and regulatory minutiae implicated by climate change to offer real relief, and the mere fact that this suit cannot alone halt climate change does not mean that it presents no claim suitable for judicial resolution.” Richardson v.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
55 
Let's personalize your content