Remove Court Reporter Remove Court Reporting Remove Statute Remove Utah
article thumbnail

February 2021 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

Circuit also rejected two arguments by coal companies against the ACE Rule. First, the court found that EPA made and retained the requisite endangerment finding for regulation of carbon dioxide emissions from power plants. The magistrate judge concluded that the suit was barred by the statute of limitations. Mountain Coal Co. ,

article thumbnail

February 2020 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

The dissent contended that “a federal court need not manage all of the delicate foreign relations and regulatory minutiae implicated by climate change to offer real relief, and the mere fact that this suit cannot alone halt climate change does not mean that it presents no claim suitable for judicial resolution.” Richardson v.