Remove Constitutional Law Remove Court Remove Government Remove Stare Decisis
article thumbnail

Word of the Month for August 2019: Stare Decisis

Legal Research is Easy

Thing is, these days law and the decisions courts hand down are very much like that. People go to one court, don't get what they want so they go to another court asking for, basically, the same thing. Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion." Schempp , 374 U.S.

article thumbnail

Justices to hear evangelical Christian postal worker’s religious accommodation case

SCOTUSBlog

DeJoy , the Supreme Court will consider whether to overturn a nearly 50-year-old precedent on how employers must accommodate their employees’ religious practices. In 1977, the Supreme Court ruled in Trans World Airlines v. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit, which upheld that decision. On Tuesday in Groff v.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

“Badly Misses the Point”: Post Columnist Hits Roberts after his Defense of the Court’s Integrity

JonathanTurley

Last week, I had the honor of addressing the judges and staff of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. also spoke at the conference and I was in attendance when he made his comments defending the legitimacy of the Court. To her credit, Marcus has opposed such court packing calls ). Chief Justice John G.

article thumbnail

We read all the amicus briefs in Dobbs so you don’t have to

SCOTUSBlog

Numerous groups attack the viability standard that the court adopted in Roe v. Against stare decisis. Many amici focus on the principle of stare decisis – and urge the court not to follow it in this case. Amicus briefs supporting Mississippi. The viability framework. Wade and Planned Parenthood v.

article thumbnail

How the Supreme Court Laid the Foundations for ‘Racialized Policing’

The Crime Report

So Chemerinsky, one of the nation’s leading authorities on constitutional law, decided to write a book focusing on how the Supreme Court has (or has not) addressed the challenge of policing throughout its judicial history. One, ‘Is public pressure in this area of life going to change the Supreme Court?”

Court 122