article thumbnail

December 2020 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

The companies filed their brief on November 16, arguing that the Fourth Circuit erred by concluding that it was limited to reviewing removal based on the federal-officer removal statute. Environmental Groups Challenged Authorization for New Natural Gas Plant in Oregon. Oregon Department of Energy , No. City of Los Angeles , No.

Court 54
article thumbnail

Government power, from federal agencies to counties, highlights January session

SCOTUSBlog

The statute includes a list of information the government must include – most notably, the time and place of the removal hearing. A noncitizen who does not attend a removal proceeding can be ordered removed as long as written notice has been provided to him under the statute. Tori Madden) The question before the justices on Jan.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

November 2020 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

Portland, Oregon. Source: Gary Halvorson, Oregon State Archives. Oregon Supreme Court Said Public Trust Doctrine Did Not Impose Obligation to Protect Resources from Climate Change. Maui asserted causes of action for public nuisance, private nuisance, strict liability failure to warn, negligent failure to warn, and trespass.

article thumbnail

TURKEY TORTS (2020)

JonathanTurley

In Portland, Oregon, Chester Hester, 24, Nicole Noriega, 38, and Bailey Willack, 23, allegedly spent Thanksgiving morning vandalizing business by smashing windows and spray-painting graffiti on banks and other businesses. The litigation over last year’s lettuce recall has only just started due to the statute of limitations.

Tort 32
article thumbnail

July 2021 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

The Court held that the provision used “extension” in its “temporal sense,” but that the statute did not impose a “continuity requirement” and instead allowed small refineries to apply for hardship extensions “at any time.” Living Rivers v. Hoffman , No. 4:19-cv-00057 (D. Utah June 21, 2021). In re Enbridge Energy, LP , Nos.

Court 44