article thumbnail

Washington family counselor challenges state’s ban on conversion therapy

SCOTUSBlog

Nineteen other states and the District of Columbia have similar laws. Brownback 22-912 Issue : Whether the Federal Tort Claims Act’s judgment bar, which this court has repeatedly said functions in much the same way as the common-law doctrine of res judicata, nevertheless operates to bar claims brought together in the same action.

article thumbnail

A quest to reclaim a Pissarro masterpiece hinges on the Erie doctrine

SCOTUSBlog

Four of them – the 2nd, 5th, 6th, and District of Columbia Circuits – have answered in the affirmative. Second, the brief draws an analogy to the Federal Tort Claims Act, which subjects the federal government to certain tort claims “in the same manner and to the same extent as a private individual.” Does Klaxon apply?

Tort 127
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

November 2020 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

The federal district court for the District of Columbia cited failures to address climate change as one of the bases for finding that a biological opinion for continued authorization of the Southeast U.S. District of Columbia v. shrimp fisheries in federal waters was arbitrary and capricious. Exxon Mobil Corp. ,

article thumbnail

July 2021 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

Supreme Court denied fossil fuel companies’ petition for writ of certiorari seeking review of the Ninth Circuit’s decision reversing the district court’s 2018 denial of Oakland’s and San Francisco’s motions to remand their climate change nuisance cases to California state court. Living Rivers v. Hoffman , No. 4:19-cv-00057 (D.

Court 45
article thumbnail

Former Rep. Hill Files Lawsuit Against Former Husband And Media Over Public Disclosures

JonathanTurley

” The complaint notes that 46 states and the District of Columbia have criminalized the dissemination nude or sexually graphic images. Sullivan have long limited tort law where it would undermine the first amendment. The Court in cases like New York Times v. Here is the provision : 1708.85. (a)

Tort 42