Remove Administrative Law Remove Court Rules Remove Laws Remove Statute
article thumbnail

Justices reject issue-exhaustion requirement for Social Security claimants

SCOTUSBlog

Saul considered whether Social Security claimants are required not only to go through the administrative process before seeking relief in court, but whether they must raise before the agency all of the issues they will present when they get to court. Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote the opinion for the court.

article thumbnail

In back-to-back cases, justices will scrutinize traditional limits on challenges to agency proceedings

SCOTUSBlog

The first case involves Axon Enterprise, an Arizona company that makes police body cameras and other technology products for law enforcement. The ALJ imposed a substantial monetary penalty and barred her from practice before the SEC, but the decision was vacated after the Supreme Court ruled in Lucia v.

Statute 100
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Supreme Court rules proposed EPA regulations unconstitutional

JURIST

” Justice Roberts goes on to say that “reflecting the ancillary nature of Section 111(d), EPA has used it only a handful of times since the enactment of the statute in 1970.” To help fulfill that duty, courts have developed certain “clear-statement” rules. ” The final ruling was 6-3 on ideological lines.

article thumbnail

“Remain in Mexico” and Texas’ anti-abortion law

SCOTUSBlog

Texas presents the latest stage in the Biden administration’s attempt to unwind the Trump administration’s “remain in Mexico” policy. After Texas and Missouri challenged that decision, a federal district court vacated the secretary’s termination, in part on the administrative-law ground that the decision was insufficiently explained.

Laws 119