Remove 2030 Remove Court Rules Remove Diligence Remove Legal
article thumbnail

Belgium court rules Belgium’s failure to meet climate obligations amounts to human rights violation

JURIST

The court accepted that the citizens have a “direct and personal interest” in the climate issue. The court stated that the Belgian state and the three regions have failed to meet the standards established by the Belgian Civil Code.

article thumbnail

Understanding Unsuccessful Climate Litigation: The Spanish Greenpeace Case

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

In this case, environmental and human rights organizations, including Greenpeace and Oxfam (“the plaintiffs”), had taken legal action against the Government of Spain, alleging inadequate action on climate change. Under Annex 1 of the EU Regulation, by 2030, Spain must have reduced its GHG emissions by 37.7% compared to 2005.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

The Transformation of European Climate Change Litigation: Introduction to the Blog Symposium

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

This alignment mirrors the anticipated direction of advisory opinions, thereby reinforcing the synergy between legal frameworks, human rights violations, and scientific imperatives in addressing the climate crisis. Verein KlimaSeniorinnen Schweiz and Others v. While the domestic case ( Commune de Grande-Synthe v.

article thumbnail

A look back at significant decisions in climate litigation in 2022

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

Courts in the Czech Republic and the United Kingdom have provided oversight of government climate mitigation actions. In June 2022, the Prague Municipal Court ruled in Klimatická žaloba ČR v. The strategy required the UK Government to set and meet legally binding targets to reduce carbon emissions. In RWE and Uniper v.

article thumbnail

Guest Commentary: New Italian Constitutional Reform: What it Means for Environmental Protection, Future Generations & Climate Litigation

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

This post examines the reform and highlights the important changes it introduces to the Italian legal system. First, it provides solid legal ground for public bodies in Italy to steer economic activities to pursue environmental (and climate) objectives. This reform bears thus a two-fold implication. In Neubauer, et al.

article thumbnail

Shell litigation in the Dutch courts – milestones for private international law and the fight against climate change

Conflict of Laws

The same holds true for substantive law of evidence, including the specific rules on the burden of proof relating to a particular legal relationship. The ruling of The Hague Court of Appeal. Increasingly, it seems, victims of environmental damage and foundations fighting for environmental protection can celebrate victories.