article thumbnail

Caddo v. Siemens: Microsoft Settlement Covers Downstream Use and No Jurisdiction Over Foreign Parent

Patently O

This underscores the importance of the non-movant diligently citing its best evidence of disputed facts when opposing summary judgment. The court also agreed Siemens AG could not be subject to specific personal jurisdiction in Illinois. I’ll note here that this outcome is in direct conflict with a 2022 jury verdict in Caddo v.

article thumbnail

July 2021 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

The Court held that the provision used “extension” in its “temporal sense,” but that the statute did not impose a “continuity requirement” and instead allowed small refineries to apply for hardship extensions “at any time.” In re Enbridge Energy, LP , Nos. EPA’s response to the petitions is due on August 5, 2021. 20-1778 (U.S.

Court 45