Remove Court Decisions Remove Diligence Remove Minnesota Remove Statute
article thumbnail

July 2021 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

The Court held that the provision used “extension” in its “temporal sense,” but that the statute did not impose a “continuity requirement” and instead allowed small refineries to apply for hardship extensions “at any time.” Minnesota Court of Appeals Upheld State Approvals for Enbridge Crude Oil Replacement Pipeline.

Court 45
article thumbnail

April 2021 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

and Minnesota Federal Courts Remanded Climate Cases Against Fossil Fuel Industry. Two federal district courts—in Minnesota and the District of Columbia—granted motions to remand cases brought by plaintiffs against the fossil fuel industry. Minnesota v. s consumer protection statute. Chevron USA Inc. ,

Court 115