Day on Torts

FEBRUARY 10, 2022

The trial court noted that “the facts regarding [defendant attorney’s] agreement to bifurcate damages were referenced in various motions leading up to the entry of final judgment,” and accordingly dismissed the action based on the statute of limitations. On appeal, dismissal was affirmed. internal citation omitted).

Legal 59

Legal Legal Tort Statute 59

Day on Torts

AUGUST 9, 2021

Further, the trial court found that plaintiff had satisfied the elements of fraudulent concealment such that the three-year statute of limitations was tolled and the case was not time-barred. The Court next analyzed defendant’s claim that the conversion case was barred by the statute of limitations. In Pomeroy v. McGinnis , No.

Divorce 59

Divorce Cause of Action Statute Diligence 59

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

JULY 2, 2021

The Court held that the provision used “extension” in its “temporal sense,” but that the statute did not impose a “continuity requirement” and instead allowed small refineries to apply for hardship extensions “at any time.” An analysis of the case by Sabin Center Senior Fellow Jennifer Danis is available on the Climate Law Blog.

Court 45

Court Statute Litigation Litigating 45

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

APRIL 9, 2021

In Minnesota, the district court granted the State of Minnesota’s motion to remand its case, which asserts state law claims under common law and consumer protection statutes. s consumer protection statute. In February, the Ninth Circuit temporarily enjoined certain construction work for the duration of the appeal.

Court 115

Court Statute Litigation Litigating 115