Remove Administrative Law Remove Constitutional Law Remove Laws Remove Litigating
article thumbnail

Justice Mahmud Jamal becomes first person of color to sit on Canada Supreme Court

JURIST

It speaks to his long career as a litigator before his appointment to the Ontario Court of Appeal in 2019. He appeared before the Supreme Court 35 times on civil, constitutional, criminal, and regulatory issues.

Court 239
article thumbnail

India Supreme Court issues notice in petition challenging bar exam rules

JURIST

The petition challenges the Bar Council of India’s authority to prescribe a post-enrollment qualification for practising law. Once an advocate has cleared the exam, the Chairman of the Bar Council issues a certificate of practice deeming them fit to practice law in India.

Bar Exam 118
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Justices Consider Making It Easier to Challenge Regulatory Power of Federal Agencies

Constitutional Law Reporter

Two of the cases involve whether litigants must wait for administrative proceedings to conclude before challenging the authority of federal agencies in federal court. The post Justices Consider Making It Easier to Challenge Regulatory Power of Federal Agencies appeared first on Constitutional Law Reporter.

article thumbnail

Justices Refuse to Require Issue Exhaustion of Social Security Claimant

Constitutional Law Reporter

Saul, 593 U.S. _ (2021) , that the principles of issue exhaustion do not require Social Security disability claimants to argue at the agency level that the administrative law judges hearing their disability claims were unconstitutionally appointed. Supreme Court unanimously held in Carr v. Facts of the Case. Thereafter, the U.S.

Statute 52
article thumbnail

Becerra’s Blunder: Did the Administration Allow Fauci and other Officials to Operate Illegally?

JonathanTurley

A House Committee is alleging that the Administration failed to properly reappoint directors at the National Institutes of Health. For reasons the Biden administration has yet to explain, it appears to have ignored the law, according to the House committee. That, too, is not allowed under federal law. Rand Paul (R-Ky.),

Legal 33
article thumbnail

Tick, Tick, Tick…: The Supreme Court Readies an Explosive Docket for 2022

JonathanTurley

After Dobbs was accepted, advocates sought to enjoin a Texas law that banned abortion after just six weeks. The court ruled 5-4 to allow the Texas law to be enforced. The Biden administration and other litigants then forced a reconsideration of that decision. Bruen is a virtual heart attack for gun control advocates.

Court 45
article thumbnail

An alarmist take on the Supreme Court’s agenda

SCOTUSBlog

Millhiser illustrates this thesis with a whirlwind tour of four key areas: the right to vote, administrative law, religion and the right to sue. In addition, even during the past 10 years, Congress has enacted a number of significant laws, including tax reforms and the gargantuan spending bills of the past year and a half.