“Court revives doctors’ lawsuit saying FDA overstepped its authority with anti-ivermectin campaign”: Kevin McGill of The Associated Press has this report.

And Cameron Langford of Courthouse News Service reports that “Fifth Circuit sides with ivermectin-prescribing doctors in their quarrel with the FDA; The Food and Drug Administration is not a physician, so it had no business cautioning people not to take ivermectin to ward off Covid-19 infections with social media posts stating, ‘You are not a horse,’ the Fifth Circuit said.”

You can access today’s ruling of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit at this link.

“Another Update on Medical Abortion Litigation”: James M. Beck has this post at the “Drug & Device Law” blog.

“Judge doubles down on Southwest ‘religious-liberty training’ sanctions order; Judge Starr refused to put the sanctions on hold while the airline appeals, called questions about requiring the training from a far-right group a ‘gripe’”: Chris Geidner has this post at his Substack site.

And online at The Washington Post, columnist Ruth Marcus has an essay titled “Texas judge again orders Southwest lawyers to reeducation camp.”

“Appeals court won’t block Trump deposition in ex-FBI employees’ suit”: Rachel Weiner of The Washington Post has this report on an unpublished order that a divided three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit issued today.

“Highways are the next antiabortion target. One Texas town is resisting. A new ordinance, passed in several jurisdictions and under consideration elsewhere, aims to stop people from using local roads to drive someone out of state for an abortion.” Caroline Kitchener of The Washington Post has this report.

“Confident of confirmation, Lamont picks Dannehy for high court; His previous nominee failed to win legislative approval, but top lawmakers signed off on new pick”: Mark Pazniokas of CT Mirror has this report.