JURIST

NOVEMBER 23, 2023

.” Under the new laws, any person who cannot be removed from Australia must now be monitored by mandatory ankle bracelets and are under a strict curfew, with failure to adhere to the new rules resulting in lengthy jail sentences. The refugee, who has the pseudonym S151, is a Chinese national who came to Australia in 2001.

Immigration 248

Immigration Laws Court Rules Lawyer 248

JURIST

MAY 5, 2024

Asylum Aid, a leading UK charity providing free legal advice and representation to asylum seekers and refugees, announced on Friday that it was launching legal action against the Home Office’s Safety of Rwanda plan to “ensure that all individual cases against removal to Rwanda are properly considered.”

Government 232

Government Legal Legal Immigration 232

SCOTUSBlog

JUNE 23, 2023

In a major victory for the Biden administration, the Supreme Court on Friday ruled that Texas and Louisiana do not have a legal right, known as standing, to challenge a Biden administration policy that prioritizes certain groups of unauthorized immigrants for arrest and deportation.

Immigration 108

Immigration Court Rules Court Depose 108

JURIST

MARCH 27, 2024

The law would also empower state magistrates to issue removal orders to individuals found to be in breach of immigration policy. Historically, immigration policy has been the prerogative of the federal government. ” Texas officials have yet to respond directly to the ruling. Plaintiffs likely cannot make that showing.

Immigration 139

Immigration Litigation Litigating Laws 139

JURIST

JANUARY 11, 2022

He further ordered that the Australian government pay Djokovic’s legal fees. Finally, Judge Kelly ordered that Djokovic will be released immediately from immigration detention and that his passport and personal effects will be returned as well.

Court Rules 233

Court Rules Immigration Court Government 233

JURIST

SEPTEMBER 14, 2021

The US Department of Justice filed an appeal on Friday with the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit challenging a lower court ruling in July blocking new applications to the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program.

Court Rules 197

Court Rules Court Immigration Government 197

JURIST

JULY 1, 2022

The Court of Justice of the European Union Thursday held that Lithuanian law ordering the automatic detention of asylum seekers was inconsistent with EU law. This law was under judicial review by the Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania for a preliminary ruling on the status of a detained asylum seeker.

Court Rules 240

Court Rules Laws Court Immigration 240

JURIST

MAY 25, 2021

The US Supreme Court ruled unanimously Monday against a non-US citizen who was contesting his indictment for unlawful re-entry into the country. In 1998, an immigration judge found that Palomar-Santiago had committed an aggravated felony under the federal immigration laws when he was convicted for driving under the influence.

Court Rules 196

Court Rules Court Immigration Felony 196

JURIST

JULY 13, 2021

The applicant had requested a family reunification with his wife, which was rejected as a result of a “three-year rule” passed in 2016, which amended Denmark’s immigration law to require refugees to wait three years before applying for family reunification.

Court Rules 197

Court Rules Laws Court Immigration 197

JURIST

DECEMBER 12, 2021

The Hungarian Constitutional Court ruled against a petition from Prime Minister Viktor Orban’s government Friday, seeking to challenge a ruling from the Court of Justice of the European Union that held Hungary’s asylum policies broke European law.

Court Rules 212

Court Rules Government Court Immigration 212

HowAppealing

MARCH 27, 2024

“Appeals Court Keeps Block on Texas Migrant Arrest Law; The decision in favor of the federal government left in place a trial court injunction while courts determine whether the measure is legal”: J. appeals court keeps block on Texas immigration law.”

Immigration 100

Immigration Government Court Legal 100

JURIST

JULY 17, 2021

District Court Judge Andrew Hanan agreed with the Texas-led coalition, finding that the creation of the program had violated the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) by not using notice and comment rulemaking in order to adopt DACA in the first place.

Court Rules 240

Court Rules Court Legal Legal 240

JURIST

JANUARY 26, 2024

. “ The Executive Branch of the United States has a constitutional duty to enforce federal laws protecting States, including immigration laws on the books right now ,” Governor Abbott’s statement reads.

Immigration 245

Immigration Felony Statute Court Rules 245

The Crime Report

JANUARY 6, 2023

People walk dangerous routes when the government eliminates or fails to provide legal avenues that are safe, permanent and predictable whether it’s across the street or across an international border. Code made it a crime to cross the border without authorization, with a specific intent to target Mexican immigrants. Thompson that U.S.

Immigration 114

Immigration Laws Misdemeanor Government 114

JURIST

NOVEMBER 16, 2021

The Hungarian legislature justified its legislation, claiming that it prevented misuse of the asylum procedure and illegal immigration based on deception. The NGO called for further action, stating, “Now Art 353/A needs to be repealed and the CJEU ruling fully respected.”

Criminal Law 130

Criminal Law Court Rules Laws Court 130

JURIST

MAY 12, 2024

Salvatore Mancuso , known as an ex-paramilitary chief, former drug trafficker, and former commander of the United Self-Defense Forces of Colombia (AUC), experienced a complex legal journey. The Court ruled in favor of Mancuso, instructing the Justice and Peace Tribunal to enforce these measures.

Court 196

Court Immigration Court Rules Legal 196

JURIST

AUGUST 1, 2022

However, the court also found, under the same directive, that while the assisting in an emergency is not enough to trigger an inspection on its own, if the EU member state thinks the conditions aboard the vessel are unsafe, that may be enough on which to base an investigation and detention after the emergency has ended.

Court Rules 196

Court Rules Court Government Legal 196

HowAppealing

DECEMBER 19, 2020

“Justices Put Off Ruling on Trump Plan for Unauthorized Immigrants and Census; The Supreme Court said a challenge to efforts to exclude unauthorized immigrants from the tabulations used to allocate House seats was premature”: Adam Liptak has this article in today’s edition of The New York Times.

Immigration 100

Immigration Court Court Rules Legal 100

JURIST

SEPTEMBER 8, 2021

” Regarding categorization, the court cited a 2010 decision that gave discretion to the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), who determined that child endangerment charges were crimes of child abuse even if no harm occurred.

Court Rules 104

Court Rules Court Immigration Legal 104

SCOTUSBlog

FEBRUARY 22, 2022

Share On Wednesday, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in a dispute over whether a group of states, led by Arizona, can defend a contentious Trump-era immigration policy known as the “public charge” rule after the Biden administration declined to do so. immigration court. immigration court.

Immigration 93

Immigration Legal Legal Government 93

SCOTUSBlog

MAY 16, 2023

Share In an opinion released on Thursday, the Supreme Court ruled that noncitizens subject to deportation do not have to ask the Board of Immigration Appeals to reconsider its allegedly erroneous decisions before seeking judicial review in the federal courts of appeals. The case, Santos-Zacaria v.

Court Rules 101

Court Rules Court Immigration Litigation 101

JURIST

JUNE 7, 2021

The US Supreme Court ruled unanimously on Monday on an immigrant status case regarding noncitizens seeking to change their immigration status from temporary protected status (TPS) to lawful permanent residency.

Immigration 188

Immigration Court Court Rules Statute 188

Chugh LLP

DECEMBER 16, 2021

Other potential changes include clarifying when material changes to H-1B employment occur and require an amended H-1B petition and streamlining notification requirements to United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) when an H-1B employee’s worksite location changes. security fees for h-1b and l-1 .

Immigration 97

Immigration Court Rules Court Legal 97

The Crime Report

DECEMBER 8, 2022

“ Travis County judges can’t hear appeals from migrants arrested under Texas border security push, court rules ” was first published by The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan media organization that informs Texans — and engages with them — about public policy, politics, government and statewide issues.

Court Rules 98

Court Rules Immigration Court Misdemeanor 98

SCOTUSBlog

DECEMBER 9, 2022

Share The Supreme Court on Friday afternoon agreed to hear four new cases, including a First Amendment challenge to a federal law that prohibits encouraging illegal immigration. Three years ago, the court agreed to take up this question in another case, United States v. Instead, a unanimous court ruled that the U.S.

Immigration 82

Immigration Statute Court Court Rules 82

JURIST

JULY 25, 2023

East Bay Sanctuary has been involved in many other immigration legal disputes, including Barr v. The new Biden-administration policy has been met with concern by human rights and immigration organizations, including the ACLU and Amnesty International.

Immigration 197

Immigration Statute Court Rules Laws 197

JURIST

FEBRUARY 27, 2021

She then challenged the dismissal of her application and the deprivation of citizenship in the Special Immigration Appeals Commission (SIAC). In light of these observations, the Supreme Court dismissed Begum’s application for judicial review of SIAC’s deprivation appeal decision. The application was dismissed.

Court Rules 118

Court Rules Court Immigration Legal 118

JURIST

JULY 27, 2023

The UK High Court ruled Thursday that the Home Secretary acted unlawfully by routinely accommodating unaccompanied asylum-seeking children (UAS children) in hotels. The judge also held that Kent County Council acted unlawfully by breaching its legal duty to look after these children.

Immigration 196

Immigration Court Court Rules Legal 196

SCOTUSBlog

DECEMBER 18, 2020

The Supreme Court on Friday ruled that it was too early to resolve the legality of the Trump administration’s plan to exclude people who are in the country illegally from the state-by-state breakdown used to allocate seats in the House of Representatives. Second, the president must send a report to Congress by Jan. At the Nov.

Immigration 104

Immigration Court Government Legal 104

SCOTUSBlog

MARCH 5, 2024

Here’s the Tuesday morning read: Supreme Court temporarily blocks new Texas immigration enforcement law (Lawrence Hurley, NBC News) Trump Prevails in Supreme Court Challenge to His Eligibility (Adam Liptak, The New York Times) Takeaways from Trump’s Supreme Court win: He stays on ballot, but his legal peril is just starting (Nicholas Riccardi, The (..)

Immigration 89

Immigration Court Rules Court Legal 89

JURIST

JANUARY 16, 2024

The United Nations Refugee Agency (UNHCR) has deemed the transfer of asylum seekers under the UK’s new Rwanda arrangement violates international law in a legal analysis published on Monday.

Laws 197

Laws Immigration Government Legal 197

Chugh LLP

JUNE 8, 2021

The United States Supreme Court has ruled that individuals who entered the United States illegally and who hold temporary protected status (TPS) are not eligible for legal permanent residency (LPR), or a green card. The post TPS Does Not Count as Admission to the US for Legal Permanent Residency appeared first on Chugh LLP.

Legal 94

Legal Legal Immigration Court Rules 94

JURIST

JULY 28, 2023

The UK High Court ruled on Thursday that Secretary of State for the Home Department Suella Braverman must not exercise her new powers to restrict protection and support of victims of modern slavery without first considering the risks of re-trafficking.

Government 196

Government Court Immigration Court Rules 196

JURIST

NOVEMBER 15, 2023

The UK Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that the government’s Rwanda plan is unlawful. The Rwanda plan was an immigration policy used by the UK government to “stop the boats” of migrants arriving in the UK. The case, which began October 9, was an appeal by the Home Office from a Court of Appeal decision.

Court 104

Court Immigration Court Rules Legal 104

JURIST

JANUARY 24, 2022

The judge agreed with the arguments put forward by the applicants, but he held that the High Court is bound by precedent. The Supreme Court had previously held in the case of Chairperson of the Immigration Selection Board v. Frank that same-sex relationships are not legal in Namibia.

ESI 197

ESI Court Immigration Court Rules 197

JURIST

FEBRUARY 19, 2024

” He warned of the negative human rights implications, stating: The combined effects of this bill, attempting to shield Government action from standard legal scrutiny, directly undercut basic human rights principles. This comes after the UK Supreme Court ruled in November 2023 that the Rwanda policy was unlawful.

Government 197

Government Immigration Constitutional Law Court Rules 197

JURIST

NOVEMBER 12, 2021

Following the passage of this law, Hungary began summarily denying asylum applications from individuals who arrived on its southern border, which frequently included Syrian refugees fleeing conflict, under the guise of a “crisis situation caused by mass immigration”.

Laws 205

Laws Immigration Court Court Rules 205