article thumbnail

Mopping up final business with 14 new relists

SCOTUSBlog

Washington , 19-333 , involves whether a state can compel a floral designer to arrange flowers to celebrate same-sex weddings. Washington , 19-333. Arlene’s Flowers Inc. Dignity Health, Inc. The solicitor general recommends the court grant review. Cummings v. Premier Rehab Keller P.L.L.C. , Disclosure : Goldstein & Russell, P.C.,

article thumbnail

Justices add one religious-rights case to docket but turn down another

SCOTUSBlog

This time the question comes to the court in the case of Barronelle Stutzman , a Washington florist and devout Christian who believes in the traditional notion of marriage. After the Washington attorney general learned about Stutzman’s refusal, he sued her for violating the state’s antidiscrimination laws, as did Ingersoll and his husband.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

October 2020 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

1442, or the civil-rights removal statute, 28 U.S.C. The district court rejected eight grounds for removal, but the Fourth Circuit concluded its appellate jurisdiction was limited to determining whether the companies properly removed the case under the federal-officer removal statute. Washington v. 19-1189 (U.S. filed Sept.

Court 72
article thumbnail

November 2020 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

The First Circuit—like the Fourth, Ninth, and Tenth Circuits in other climate change cases—concluded that the scope of its appellate review was limited to whether the defendants properly removed the case under the federal-officer removal statute. Washington , No. County of Maui v. Sunoco LP , No. 2CCV-20-0000283 (Haw. 22O152 (U.S.

article thumbnail

Free exercise, greenhouse-gas regulation, and a slew of other relists from the long conference

SCOTUSBlog

Inslee , a challenge to a Washington state law that shields the personal information of in-home care providers from public disclosure but allows the state to provide that data to the union that represents the providers. Washington. Washington , 19-333. In addition, the court relisted: Boardman v. Epic Systems Corp v.

article thumbnail

February 2021 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

The magistrate judge concluded that the suit was barred by the statute of limitations. The court further found that the plaintiffs conceded that venue in Boulder County was not proper for San Miguel under this statute. Trump Administration Did Not Weigh in on Montana and Washington’s Case Against Washington for Blocking Coal Exports.

article thumbnail

Could Gov. Cuomo Face Criminal Charges in Sex Harassment Scandal?

The Crime Report

In both cases where the testimony according to James is damning, the incidents fall within the two-year statute of limitations that applies to misdemeanors in New York State. . “It