SCOTUSBlog

OCTOBER 13, 2022

United States , the 1950 Supreme Court case holding that the United States is not liable under the Federal Tort Claims Act for injuries sustained by members of the armed forces while on active duty and resulting from the negligence of others in the armed forces. Arizona , 21-1553. United States. 28 and Oct. 7 conferences).

Tort 100

Tort Construction Court Felony 100

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

OCTOBER 7, 2019

The court also temporarily enjoined two felony riot statutes because they went “far beyond” the State’s “appropriate interest” in criminalizing participation in a riot with acts of force or violence. The federal district court for the District of Arizona enjoined the U.S. National Review, Inc. , 2012 CA 008263 B (D.C.

Court 40

Court Government Statute Tort 40

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

FEBRUARY 10, 2021

The court, which did not address the plaintiffs’ arguments regarding alleged inadequacies in the climate change-related analyses, found that the plaintiffs failed to demonstrate a likelihood of success on the merits or that they would suffer irreparable harm. Ministry of Economic Affairs (Taipei Administrative Court).

Court Reporting 55

Court Reporting Court Construction Government 55

JonathanTurley

FEBRUARY 5, 2022

The trial began with the introduction of evidence that the New York Times editorial board ignored internal objections to publishing the 2017 column linking Palin to the 2011 shooting in Tucson, Arizona in which then-U.S. Gabrielle Giffords, D-Ariz was seriously injured.

Tort 40

Tort Drafting Court Court Rules 40

JonathanTurley

DECEMBER 27, 2020

The Supreme Court ruled that tort law could not be used to overcome First Amendment protections for free speech or the free press. The Court sought to create “breathing space” for the media by articulating that standard that now applies to both public officials and public figures.

Laws 44

Laws Tort Law School Court 44