ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

APRIL 18, 2023

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit handed down a decision in California Restaurant Association v. The court overturned a District Court ruling to invalidate a Berkeley, California, prohibition on natural gas infrastructure in newly-constructed buildings. O n Monday, April 17, 2023, the U.S. City of Berkeley.

Construction 114

Construction Government Legal Legal 114

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

DECEMBER 11, 2020

The appellate court also found that even if the trial court erred, the error was harmless because the State proved both acts beyond a reasonable doubt. Hawaii Court Ruled that Commercial Aquarium Fishing Required Environmental Review. Lawsuit Challenged Development Plan for Portion of National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska.

Court 55

Court Government Litigation Litigating 55

The Crime Report

JANUARY 4, 2023

As Adams faded into the background, Harpster took their work on tour, from Florida to Alaska, to university lecture halls and international homicide conferences, city police academies and statewide coroners’ seminars. The extended curriculum is a two-day, 16-hour course that includes basic and advanced training.

Attorney 98

Attorney Court Laws Education 98

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

MARCH 6, 2018

DECISIONS AND SETTLEMENTS. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a district court decision that vacated the listing of the Arctic ringed seal as threatened under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). Alaska Oil & Gas Association v. Louisiana Federal Court Halted Work on Crude Oil Pipeline in Swamp Area.

Court 40

Court Government Laws Litigation 40

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

SEPTEMBER 10, 2021

Alaska Federal Court Vacated Federal Approvals of Major Oil Development Project in National Petroleum Reserve. The federal district court for the District of Alaska found deficiencies in federal defendants’ reviews and approvals of ConocoPhillips Alaska, Inc.’s The court therefore vacated the U.S.

Litigation 40

Litigation Litigating Court Laws 40

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

JUNE 8, 2021

Justice Sotomayor dissented, writing that she believed the Court’s interpretation would allow defendants to “sidestep” the general bar on appellate review by “shoehorning” a civil rights or federal officer removal argument into their case for removal. Alaska May 26, 2021). Justice Alito did not take part in the case. Connecticut v.

Court 42

Court Statute Government Litigation 42