JURIST
MAY 16, 2022
Under § 2255, federal inmates can collaterally challenge their convictions on any ground cognizable on collateral review, with successive attacks limited to certain claims indicating “factual innocence” or relying on “constitutional law decisions made retroactive” by the Supreme Court. ” Jones v. Cochran is.
JURIST
NOVEMBER 4, 2022
In March, a group of voters challenged Greene’s eligibility to run for office claiming that Greene had “engaged in insurrection” connected to the events at the US Capitol on January 6, 2021. An administrative law judge ruled that the challengers lacked sufficient evidence to prove that Greene engaged in the January 6 insurrection.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
JURIST
FEBRUARY 14, 2023
The US National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) ruled Monday that Starbucks violated federal labor laws by firing two workers who were planning to organize a union at a Philadelphia store in 2020. The case predates the massive unionizing of Starbucks workers across the country, which began in 2021.
LexForti
NOVEMBER 25, 2021
She specialises in Corporate Laws. The concept of ‘ fit and proper ’ in corporate laws are just as alluding as the qualifying authority of ‘ reasonableness ’ in constitutional and administrative laws. The post Fit and Proper person criteria: SEBI 2021 Amendment appeared first on LexForti.
Mondaq
DECEMBER 22, 2021
On December 13, 2021, the Fifth Circuit issued an en banc opinion in Cochran v. Securities & Exchange Commission et al., finding that the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 does not strip.
Customs & International Trade Law
JULY 1, 2022
Here is a recap of the latest customs and international trade law news: USITC. On June 28, 2022, the USITC determined to review in part a final initial determination (“FID”) of the presiding Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”). The period of investigation was April 1, 2020, through March 31, 2021. On June 24, 2022, the U.S.
JURIST
DECEMBER 13, 2021
.” The court determined that Støjberg’s actions were intentional and in violation of Article 8 of the European Convention of Human Rights, as well as general principles of Danish administrative law; 25 out of 26 judges voted to convict. European law forbids family separations of any kind except for extreme circumstances.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
190 
Let's personalize your content