The Court of Arbitration for Sports hears Russia appeal against International Olympic Committee ban News
Fanny Schertzer, CC BY 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons
The Court of Arbitration for Sports hears Russia appeal against International Olympic Committee ban

The Lausanne-based Court of Arbitration for Sports (CAS) heard Russia’s appeal Friday against the sanctions imposed by the International Olympic Committee (IOC) on the Russian Olympic Committee (ROC).

The IOC in October 2023 banned the ROC with immediate effect for “breach of the charter.” The step came on the heels of the ROC recognizing the Olympic council of the Donetsk People’s Republic (DPR) and Lugansk People’s Republic (LPR), which are annexed territories of Ukraine, as its members. According to the IOC, this violated the national integrity of the National Olympic Committee (NOC) of Ukraine which is against the spirit of the Olympic Charter. The ROC was suspended, which caused the organization to cease receiving funding from the Olympic Movement, along with other benefits granted to it. The ban on the ROC did not affect the participation status of Russian and Belarusian athletes at the Paris Olympics 2024 and Milano Cortina Winter Olympics 2026 which the IOC stated it would consider at a later stage.

The CAS, which is the ultimate global authority for resolving sports-related disputes, on November 6, 2023, registered an appeal from the ROC against the IOC’s decision. The ROC requested CAS to set aside the order and reinstate it as an an official olympic committee.

Following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, the IOC issued recommendations wherein it urged sports federations and organizers to exclude Russian and Belarusian athletes and officials from international sports events. Subsequently, a majority of  global sports federations barred athletes from the respective countries. However, the IOC allowed Russian and Belarusian athletes to compete as neutral athletes in individual events without their national flag, emblem or anthem. The IOC said that the individual athletes should not be punished for the actions committed by the government.

The details of the hearing have yet to be published. The decision made by CAS will be binding, except the parties would be allowed, on certain grounds, to appeal to the Swiss Federal Tribunal.

THIS DAY @ LAW

Bank of England granted political independence

On May 6, 1997, British Chancellor of the Exchequer Gordon Brown announced that the Bank of England would be granted political independence for the first time in the three-hundred year history of the Bank. This policy was statutized in the subsequent Bank of England Act of 1998 gave the Bank independent control of British monetary policy effective June 1, 1998. Read the Bank of England Act of 1998.

Chinese Exclusion Act barred Chinese laborers from US

On May 6, 1882, President Chester A. Arthur signed the Chinese Exclusion Act, barring Chinese laborers from entering the United States and prohibiting courts from bestowing US citizenship on Chinese. Connecticut Senator Joseph Hawley spoke out against the Act in these words: Let the proposed statue be read 100 years hence, dug out of the dust of ages and forgotten as it will be except for a line of sneer by some historian, and ask the young man not well read in the history of this country what was the reason for excluding these men and he would not be able to find it in the law. The Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882 and its successors were abolished in 1943 at the insistence of President Franklin Roosevelt.