article thumbnail

Federal Circuit Gives Stare Decisis Effect to a Judgment of Claim Validity

Patently O

Stare decisis, Latin for “to stand by things decided,” is a legal principle that directs courts to adhere to previous judgments, i.e., precedent, when resolving a case with comparable facts. the Federal Circuit applied stare decisis to a prior validity ruling involving a different patent and a different accused infringer.

article thumbnail

Doctrinal “dinosaur” or stare decisis? Justices wrestle with patent-law precedent.

SCOTUSBlog

Taking a different approach, Justice Clarence Thomas pointed out that the Patent Act does not mention claim preclusion or issue preclusion, but those doctrines nevertheless bar certain arguments in patent litigation. Wolf principally argued that stare decisis justifies maintaining the doctrine. Matthew Wolf argued for Hologic.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Clarence Thomas: “When Someone Uses Stare Decisis that Means They’re Out of Arguments”

JonathanTurley

Wade as “an infidelity,” Thomas dismissed the reliance on the principle of stare decisis , or the respect for precedent. Thomas told an audience that “I always say that when someone uses stare decisis that means they’re out of arguments. That was one of the central arguments in favor of preserving Roe.

article thumbnail

Word of the Month for August 2019: Stare Decisis

Legal Research is Easy

Of course, this brings us to our word of the month: STARE DECISIS. According to Black's Law Dictionary, STARE DECISIS means: Latin: To stand by things decided. The doctrine of precedent, under which a court must follow earlier judicial decisions when the same points arise again in litigation.

article thumbnail

India Supreme Court allows petition of 2002 communal riots victim

JURIST

However, the court has kept open whether other writ petitions filed as public interest litigation (PIL) challenging the remission orders are maintainable for future appropriate cases. Hence, Bano was not obligated to file a writ petition under Article 226 before the Gujarat State High Court.

article thumbnail

A quiet bench on the Quiet Title Act: Justices hold muted debate on statute of limitations

SCOTUSBlog

The issue that came to the Supreme Court from that litigation is the one I mentioned above: whether the 12-year statute of limitations is a strict jurisdictional bar, which plainly would put Wilkins out of court, or instead a claims-processing rule, which would leave some opportunity for the trial court to excuse the tardy filing.

Statute 99
article thumbnail

US dispatch: ‘independent state legislature’ theory raised by Moore v. Harper threatens US election administration

JURIST

In normal circumstances, the Court’s previous repudiations of the independent state legislature theory would counsel in favor of following the principle of stare decisi s, which suggests the Court should not overturn previous decisions except in extreme circumstances. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission (2015).