In its affidavit supporting criminal charges, the Justice Department showed Air Force lieutenant colonel Larry Rendall Brock on the Senate floor on January 6, 2021 in a helmet and combat gear. That outfit only magnified the anger of many of us over the riot and the interruption of our constitutional process of certification. However, while there was little question of the validity of the charges against him, U.S. District Judge John Bates in March 2023 imposed a two year sentence based on a common enhancing factor cited by the government in many of these cases for the “substantial interference with the administration of justice.” A panel on the D.C. Circuit has now ruled against the use of that enhancer in a decision that could compel the resentencing of dozens of defendants from the January 6th riot.
The Justice Department has long been accused of excessive charging and abusive detention conditions for January 6th defendants. The heavy-handed treatment was apparently by design. In a controversial television interview, Justice official Michael Sherwin proudly declared that “our office wanted to ensure that there was shock and awe … it worked because we saw through media posts that people were afraid to come back to D.C. because they’re, like, ‘If we go there, we’re gonna get charged.’ … We wanted to take out those individuals that essentially were thumbing their noses at the public for what they did.”
District court judges just went along with the use of the enhancement, even though it was based on a highly attenuated claim. As the D.C. Circuit found, “Congress’s certification of electoral college votes does not fit the ‘administration of justice’ mold.” It then noted:
“Considered in context, Congress’s counting and certification of electoral votes is but the last step in a lengthy electoral certification process involving state legislatures and officials as well as Congress. Taken as a whole, the multi-step process of certifying electoral college votes—as important to our democratic system of government as it is—bears little resemblance to the traditional understanding of the administration of justice as the judicial or quasi-judicial investigation or determination of individual rights.”
The argument of the Biden Administration always seemed curious to me given the claims of former President Donald Trump that Vice President Michael Pence had the authority to reject state certifications. I disagreed with that view. However, arguing that this is a type of judicial proceeding would seem to enhance the Trump argument. Yet, that is what the Justice Department did in many of these cases to enhance sentencing.
Ultimately, Judge Bates’ sentencing was not as high as what the Justice Department wanted. Judge Bates detailed the considerable evidence against Brock in his preparation for violence. He wrote before the riot “Do not kill LEO [law enforcement officers] unless necessary… Gas would assist in this if we can get it.” It was also short of the maximum under the guidelines of 30 months. The sentence may have been reduced by as much as nine months without the enhancer.
There could also be substantial reductions for a couple of hundred of other defendants who were sentenced with the enhancer. It is not clear if the government will appeal the ruling.
We are also waiting for the oral argument in Fischer v. United States, which will consider the use of the felony charge of obstructing an official proceeding against defendants tied to the January 6th riot. Trump is also being prosecuted in part for that crime.
Brock is currently serving his two-year prison term at MCFP Springfield in Missouri.
Here is the opinion: United States v. Brock
Dennis McIntyre, police state fascist and Defender of Democracy™️ is off-topic Trumpping again:
Jonathan: The week would not be complete without discussing DJT’s difficulties in coming up with the cash…
You would think this is McIntyre’s blog and comment section, the way he decides to treat it that way, off topic every day going on about what HE wants to see appear on the webpage. Did anybody believe Dennis our resident Soviet Democrat police state fascist would go off topic to post about how his fellow Soviets in Colorado got their attempt to destroy democracy shot down by SCOTUS? 17 states ran by Soviet Democrats decide they would simply not allow anyone in their state to choose to vote for Trump.
That’s the Soviet Democrat Defenders of Democracy™️ Insurrection in action.
How about going off topic to discuss the difficulties of other legal proceedings for Biden White House Crime LLC? Here’s some for you Dennis:
Perjury charges imminent: Bribery Biden contradicts testimony of son Hunter
https://pjmedia.com/matt-margolis/2024/03/02/now-joe-biden-is-contradicting-hunter-bidens-testimony-n4926943
Perjury charges imminent: James Biden confirms President Biden received $40,000 from ChiComs
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/james-biden-confirms-joe-biden-received-funds-originating-from-chinese-firm/ar-BB1jdIdK
Things aren’t going well for the Fini Willis component of the Biden White House RICO conspiracy to take out Trump…
Perjury charges imminent: Closing Arguments in Fani Willis Disqualification Hearing Do Not Go Well For Her
redstate.com/nick-arama/2024/03/02/closing-arguments-fani-willis-n2170831
Old Airborne Dog,
You might not be aware but this web log only permits two or fewer hyperlinks per comment. I edited the above comment so that it would post. If you in the future would like for the readership to review three or more links, this may be accomplished through multiple comments of two or fewer links each.