UK Financial Reporting Council fines auditing firm PwC over BT Group audit News
777546 / Pixabay
UK Financial Reporting Council fines auditing firm PwC over BT Group audit

The UK Financial Reporting Council (FRC) Monday fined accounting and auditing firm PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) £1.75 million over their Fiscal Year 2017 (FY17) audit of telecom company BT Group after it was discovered that the audit failed to uncover evidence of fraud.

The FRC reported that BT group’s financial statements for FY17 had to be adjusted by £513 million because of fraud, which was discovered following investigations into BT Group’s Italian operations in 2016.

PwC performed BT Group’s FY17 statutory audit, an audit that is required by law. Richard Hughes was the audit engagement partner and Senior Statutory Auditor for the audit. Both PwC and Hughes were required to act in accordance with the International Standards on Auditing when carrying out the audit.

The FRC in their final settlement decision found that a heightened professional skepticism was needed when dealing with BT Italy’s adjustments, corrections of prior-period errors, and changes in accounting estimates. The FRC found that such a level of professional skepticism had not been met. 

It was also found that neither party obtained sufficient appropriate audit evidence concerning debt adjustments. They failed to determine whether the changes in the accounting estimates were appropriate for the debt adjustments. Lastly, the parties did not prepare audit documentation which would allow an experienced auditor to understand the nature, timing, and extent of the audit procedure concerning the split between corrections of prior-period errors and changes in estimates.

PwC received a financial sanction of £2,500,000, which was reduced to a payable amount due of £1,750,000 due to admissions and early settlement. Mr. Hughes received a financial sanction of £60,000, which was also reduced for the same rationale to £42,000.

Claudia Mortimore, Deputy Executive Counsel for the FRC said that “[t]he sanctions imposed in this case, where certain elements of the adjustments following a fraud were not subject to the required level of professional [skepticism,] underscore this message and will serve as a timely reminder to the profession.”

Both parties have 28 days after the date of this Final Settlement Decision Notice to pay the financial sanctions.

 

THIS DAY @ LAW

Bank of England granted political independence

On May 6, 1997, British Chancellor of the Exchequer Gordon Brown announced that the Bank of England would be granted political independence for the first time in the three-hundred year history of the Bank. This policy was statutized in the subsequent Bank of England Act of 1998 gave the Bank independent control of British monetary policy effective June 1, 1998. Read the Bank of England Act of 1998.

Chinese Exclusion Act barred Chinese laborers from US

On May 6, 1882, President Chester A. Arthur signed the Chinese Exclusion Act, barring Chinese laborers from entering the United States and prohibiting courts from bestowing US citizenship on Chinese. Connecticut Senator Joseph Hawley spoke out against the Act in these words: Let the proposed statue be read 100 years hence, dug out of the dust of ages and forgotten as it will be except for a line of sneer by some historian, and ask the young man not well read in the history of this country what was the reason for excluding these men and he would not be able to find it in the law. The Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882 and its successors were abolished in 1943 at the insistence of President Franklin Roosevelt.