Doctrinal “dinosaur” or stare decisis? Justices wrestle with patent-law precedent.
SCOTUSBlog
APRIL 23, 2021
An inventor files a patent application on an invention and assigns the patent rights to an assignee — perhaps in exchange for money from the assignee, or perhaps as part of a contract with the inventor’s employer. Wolf principally argued that stare decisis justifies maintaining the doctrine. Matthew Wolf argued for Hologic.
Let's personalize your content